User talk:Coronethouse2008

November 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you recently removed content from Peter Bance without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 00:40, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Arjayay

Yes i did make the edits, as I am peter bance and I noticed alot of the bio date was incorrect and quotes given in the page are not from me. so not to mislead people i wanted to edite and delete where appropriate. Coronethouse2008 (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Peter Bance, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

about 25% of this is incorrect about me. i hardly added anything just deleted line which were wrong about me. Coronethouse2008 (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Coronethouse2008. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Peter Bance, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so have you been undoing my edits? i mean even my DOB is incorrect. I am not promoting my work if anything i have removed works and quotes which are not by me. In the past i have seen people put abuse on my page, surely minor edits are ok to remain, even the grammar is so poor by whoever has contributed to it.

May i ask are you an employee of wikipedia? Coronethouse2008 (talk) 15:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the wikipedia notice clearly states :

Material about living persons should not be added when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism;

Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page,

So then these parts of the page should be removed. please assist me in getting these removed as every time I have done so they have been put back. Article tabloid journalism should not be used. and so should poorly sourced material.

thanks you Coronethouse2008 (talk) 15:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there were/are errors. I have removed your year of birth and corrected the location of Duleep Singh's grave, which you had as Thetford, not Elveden. I have also removed an irrelevance about a brick. What else, specifically, do you think is incorrect, and why? - Arjayay (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bance had collaborated with Satinder Sartaaj in producing the 2017 film, The Black Prince.

(This is incorrect as i was never involved in producing this film, i assisted in the script and pre production side. So you can say i was involved in the film but producing is misleading)

Bance states that although Sikhs passionately request that historical materials related to them currently in foreign collections be returned to Sikhs, that the heritage itself that was left in Sikh-control has not been properly taken care of. Bance states that whilst items gifted to the British by the Sikhs have been taken care of in British hands, the things that other parties gifted to the Sikhs at Lahore has not been similarly looked after with such care. He criticizes families of former Sikh princely states in the post-independence-era for auctioning off their historical collections to private buyers to make money rather than handing them over to the government. In-contrast to this, Bance praises the British museums currently holding historical Sikh-related materials, in that their manner of handling and obtaining these items is far superior in-terms of historical preservation and from an ethical perspective.

(this whole paragraph was misquoted and i have told the editors of this magazine too, as i never said this)

Furthermore, he claims that on a weekly-basis hundreds of members of the general public from both India and Pakistan contact him through social media requesting him to visit their locality to document the Sikh heritage located there, as they lack the know-how on how to do this themselves. (again a misquote as i never said this nor have i ever been told this)

Bance advocates that a grassroots movement advocating for the proper restoration and preservation of historical Sikh sites and their original architecture is necessary, which works together with private enthusiasts and government bodies in-cooperation with one another. Bance further claims that a lack of willpower rather than a lack of funds is responsible for the poor conservation of Sikh historical sites.

(i have never advocated this and do not work with nay government body nor have said people should)

i have also written to the magazine editor asking them to edit the article and not misquote me, as they have told me they will rectify this Coronethouse2008 (talk) 14:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]