User talk:Coralmizu/Archive 13
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Coralmizu. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Lost AFD
Hi, just to let you know, something went wrong when you relisted this AFD but accidently commented it out, and it is still open. Should I re-list it? or as you are an admin and didn't participate you could close it? ascidian | talk-to-me 18:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for that notification, Ascidian! I think I'll be staying away from AfD for a while (or at least not with the use of the closer tool). The consensus seemed to be 'delete', to I closed it and took appropriate action. Very sorry about this mistake! —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 02:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- No worries, we all make mistakes sometimes! Thanks for fixing it, regards, ascidian | talk-to-me 16:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
I plan to contest your speedy deletion of this, you did not even inform me that it was up for speedy, it's not a new article, and was improperly deleted. This one should have been AfD at most. Is there a reason you did not notify me, as is standard procedure on such an older non-nonsense article? Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, Chris. First, it's usually standard procedure for the person nominating it for speedy deletion to notify the creator, not the deleting admin (this is usually redundant, and therefore not commonly done). Granted, I definitely should have checked, though I don't normally do this because it's commonplace (and is even noted in the template) for the tagger.
- Second, the article did not assert a whole lot of notability. Calling her an 'actor, model, idol' (etc.) still does not show us that she is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. With that said, however, this appears to show just enough media coverage, in my opinion, to pass. I'm going to undelete this, because she seems notable enough to have an article of her own, even if the article did not assert much notability. Please edit the article further to show evidence of notability, or it could be re-tagged.
- Hope this wasn't too much of a bother for you. :-) Cheers, —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 00:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC).
- Thank you, and sorry if I wigged. :) Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 04:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- ps, when will you undelete? And I'm sorry, I did not know how to see the history once it disappeared to know who tagged it. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Now seems a good time, since you are signed in and can edit it as soon as it's recreated. :-) —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 04:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
School computers
Well it isn't the first time it's blocked a site for a stupid reason... It also blocked a game site as a hacker site... Reliable Forevertalk 13:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- P.S. Lightspeed Systems is responsible for blocking sites, the computer itself is not. There was a Lightspeed Systems article, but it apparently got deleted. Reliable Forevertalk 13:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, so you can't edit from school at all now? That's a shame. Well, at least you are still able at home, from what I gather. Was there anything at school you could do that you cannot at home? —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 02:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Smile!
A NobodyMy talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
- Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
- An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
- News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
- Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
- Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 16:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks and a request
Thanks for signing up at Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers and for your work doing reviews. It is now just over a year since the last peer review was archived with no repsonse after 14 (or more) days, something we all can be proud of. There is a new Peer review user box to track the backlog (peer reviews at least 4 days old with no substantial response), which can be found here. To include it on your user or talk page, please add {{Wikipedia:Peer review/PRbox}} . Thanks again, and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films February 2009 Newsletter
The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Open Proxies
I have several questions : 1. What is an open proxy? 2. How is an open proxy disruptive? 3. What is a zombie computer? 4. What is a Static IP address? 5. What is a Dynamic IP address? 6. ^ overall, what is the difference between a static IP address and a Dynamic IP address? 7. And how exactly does an open proxy constantly change IP addresses?
these articles: Zombie (computing) IP address WP:Proxy are very unclear to me. So could you please answer these questions? Reliable Forevertalk 22:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, RF. An open proxy in its general sense is a proxy that anyone can use. Now, in the specific, more Wikipedia sense, open proxies are usually anonymising IP addresses that allow one to edit while hiding your computer's IP address. So if you used an open proxy with the IP address 11.11.11.11 and your (the one your internet service provider gave) IP address is 212.33.566.01, in Wikipedia's edit history it would completely mask your IP address and show up as 11.11.11.11. It is a bit difficult to explain, but I think that gives you the idea. Basically, these are blocked pretty much for the reason expected: open proxies allow vandals to edit under a different IP even after they have been blocked indefinitely by their home IP address. Also, the edits are so difficult to track from these proxies that we find it is just easier to block them immediately when they are identified. Does that answer you question?
- Now, a zombie computer is (again, trying to answer this to the best of my knowlege without being particularly computer-knowledgeable) a computer that has been taken over by a hacker using a virus or something similar. The computer is then used to perform illegal or otherwise bad tasks while the computer's owner, who doesn't know the computer is being taken over, gets blamed for everthing that the hacker is doing. This allows the hacker to do whatever they want without getting caught, because they are controlling a 'zombie' (i.e., one's computer, without consent).
- A static IP address is just an IP that remains 'static' and does not change. A dynamic IP is one that frequently changes, like those that sockpuppets use to evade blocks to further vandalise. Open proxies do not rapidly change IP addresses; I think that is where you are confused. They merely hide your IP address and use the proxy's name (the IP, like 11.11.11.11) instead, so you can do things without getting caught. This is why many people don't like open or anonymising proxies, even outside of Wikipedia. They tend to be used by hackers and computer criminals to hide personal information that could help them get caught.
- Hope this helped you, RF! —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 15:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Good explanation, Mizu ;) I'd add that some Internet Service Providers assign their customers' IP addresses dynamically (I believe British Telecom do so in the UK), so you get a different IP address every time you connect, while others give their customers static addresses that rarely change (a UK example is Virgin Media). Having a dynamic IP doesn't mean you're a sockpuppet, it just depends on who you get your internet access from. That can make spotting proxies difficult though :P EyeSerenetalk 17:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. Thanks for touching up on that, ES. :-) —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 04:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Good explanation, Mizu ;) I'd add that some Internet Service Providers assign their customers' IP addresses dynamically (I believe British Telecom do so in the UK), so you get a different IP address every time you connect, while others give their customers static addresses that rarely change (a UK example is Virgin Media). Having a dynamic IP doesn't mean you're a sockpuppet, it just depends on who you get your internet access from. That can make spotting proxies difficult though :P EyeSerenetalk 17:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
?
see this : [1] . after 96.11.189.125 was blocked, 75.219.204.39 appeared on 96.11.189.125's talk page, saying this : [2]. In this case, Zagalejo gave the first and only warning to 96.11.189.125 . Could you please check that out? (it's a little bit suspicious) . Reliable Forevertalk 19:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wait. see this also: [3]... It turns out 75.219.204.39 IS 96.11.189.125 ... Reliable Forevertalk 16:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was in the process of handling this issue when the server apparently experienced some issues again. So, I will try to pick this up where I left off in taking care of said anon. Thanks for being patient, RF. :-) —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 01:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Alrightie. I'm going to leave this one 'as-is' because 75.219 has not make further edits and 96.11 is blocked. However, if you see any more suspicious activity with these two, or if you see another sock, please let me know. I'll be keeping watch with you.
- I was in the process of handling this issue when the server apparently experienced some issues again. So, I will try to pick this up where I left off in taking care of said anon. Thanks for being patient, RF. :-) —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 01:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Much appreciated, you're doing a great job. :-) —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 02:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
User talk:Apostrophe
A lot of Encyclopedia Dramaticans have targeted his/her talk page. You can tell just by the history: [4]. The history is FILLED with ridiculous vandalism. Could you semi-protect? Thanks, Reliable Forevertalk 12:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Coordinator nominations
Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
- News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
- Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Coralmizu
Kirei ;) EyeSerenetalk 09:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, ES. :-) Just thought it would be better than having a verbosely lengthly name. —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 20:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Just the sig remaining then... :D EyeSerenetalk 13:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was going to leave it for a little bit so people don't think I've disappeared, but I changed it anyway. Not too gaudy? —Coralmizu (Mizu onna sango15)Drop a line 20:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- Just the sig remaining then... :D EyeSerenetalk 13:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Frequently used idea and approved areas
The Frequently used idea are needs updating seriously and now the future of the approved area is questioned. Please see the discussions at Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations#Help with FUI and Approved area discussion. Simply south (talk) 22:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009
- News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Happy Saint Patrick’s Day!
On behalf of the Wikipedia:Kindness Campaign, we just want to spread Wikipedia:WikiLove by wishing you a Happy Saint Patrick’s Day! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 15:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Username Change
I miss your old username... :/ Reliable Forevertalk 20:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, 'Coralmizu' isn't that bad, is it? :-) —Coralmizu (Mizu onna sango15)Drop a line 07:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nope Coralmizu isn't a bad username. I just like Mizu onna sango15 better because it makes more sense than Coralmizu. Reliable Forevertalk 13:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Coordinator Election
Archive
Could you please protect User talk:Reliableforever/Archive 1? Because it is an archive so there is no reason for anyone to edit it. Thanks, Reliable Forevertalk 13:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem. —Coralmizu (Mizu onna sango15)Drop a line 18:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
You have 2 emails. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problemo. I had some trouble logging in there for a bit, thanks for bringing that to my attention. —Coralmizu (Mizu onna sango15)Drop a line 05:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Question
What does it mean to be 'concerned for someone'? Reliable Forevertalk 11:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Usually that you're worried about them, but it could depend on the context as to what the specific concern is. Helps? (and sorry for the late response!) EyeSerenetalk 18:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind, my teacher explained it to me when I asked her. Reliable Forevertalk 22:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Heh, ok. It was a bit of a late reply ;) EyeSerenetalk 11:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind, my teacher explained it to me when I asked her. Reliable Forevertalk 22:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Adoption!
Hello there!
I was looking around the adopt a user page and saw your name/description/interests etc and was wondering if you would be willing to adopt me! I was on Wikipedia for a while before, but then took a (very) long hiatus and am now looking for a new hobby and pastime to get into (again). Sometimes school will eat my life but I want to have a pretty regular presence around here.
Anyway, let me know! Thank you very much. ---Galaxy250 (talk) 18:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films March 2009 Newsletter
The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
- News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
- WikiProject report: WikiProject China
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Adopt
Hi Lucille! I'm new to Wikipedia and was wondering if you are still adopting. If you are do you want to adopt me? My name is Andrea and I am 18 years old.
I need help in my articles Thanks!
--Dexwester (talk) 02:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- No problem; ask any questions necessary! First off, do you know the basics of wikiformat? :-) —Coralmizu (Mizu onna sango15)Drop a line 20:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Happy Easter!
On behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just wanted to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Happy Easter! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 07:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- License update: Licensing vote begins
- News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
- Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- Book reviews: Reviews of The Wikipedia Revolution
- Wikipedia by numbers: Wikipedia's coverage and conflicts quantified
- News and notes: New program officer, survey results, and more
- Dispatches: Valued pictures
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Film
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films April 2009 Newsletter
The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
MOTD
Would be gatreful if you have any ideas for mottos. Please help at WP:MOTD/N. Also see Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Archive 5#Archival Simply south (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Comedian Jay Dee
You deleted the page a month or so back because it needed one more source. There is now another source available. Can we get the page added back now? http://www.tulsapeople-digital.com/tulsapeople/200906/?u1=texterity Bruce Jennings (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Bruce, sorry I couldn't get to you sooner. I would like to get the opinions of Old Yeller and MBisanz before I make any decisions, as Old Yeller was the lister and MBisanz was the closing admin. Also, the consensus to delete was mainly based on notability; references were a secondary concern. I'll direct their attention to this topic and we can talk it out here, if it's agreeable with you. :-)
WikiProject Films May 2009 Newsletter
The May 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films June 2009 Newsletter
The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Coralmizu. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |