User talk:Cooltrainer Hugh

Welcome!

Hello, Cooltrainer Hugh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

ff m 22:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Maddy and Hugh.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Hi Cooltrainer Hugh!
We thank you for uploading Image:Maddy and Hugh.JPG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot.

--John Bot III (talk) 12:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surrey for all that

Hi Cooltrainer

Thanks for the advice - actually another editor has told me how to get the boxes as I want, but I haven't got round to fixing it yet. Welcome to the Surrey project - a bit dormant at the moment. BTW, you seem to have picked up the wrong template on your user page. Regards Motmit (talk) 08:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:61004893O.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:61004893O.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may need this

Aristotle

Eudaimonia – happiness/flourishing Eudaimon life – best possible life Fulfilling smaller pleasures to lead a supremely good life A life can’t be eudaimon until death

CRITICISM Individualist, egotistical, elitist Money and time required for Eudaimonic life

Sartre Condemned to be free ‘Bad Faith’ – existential condition – self-deception – waiter example (immersing himself in waiter role, bringing him illicit satisfaction. Cooltrainer Hugh (talk) 14:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Towcester station.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Towcester station.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a great photo for the Towcester station page; it would be very useful if you could provide sufficient information to allow us to keep it. Lamberhurst (talk) 20:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute !=vandalism

Cooltrainer Hugh,

Please don't label a content dispute 'vandalism'. It's clear from your userboxes that you have a POV on UKIP, and that seems to be colouring your actions. The party's aims are to strip us of our rights. You may applaud that aim, but trying to hide it is the vandalism. I've seen a policy page called Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers, which I think you would do well to read. Yours, 83.104.50.65 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page User talk:83.104.50.65 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Hi - you'll find it in para 2.1, sentence 3, aim to withdraw. The edit I made was to spell out what that means, and that constitutes fact. Your edit was pro-UKIP propaganda, because 'self-rule' sounds cuddly, and is a highly selective portion of their vitriol, so using only that bit constitutes very biased UKIP-POVness. Please stop vandalising userpages with the use of inappropriate templates. Yours. 83.104.50.65 (talk)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Huntingdon (UK Parliament constituency); Gainsborough (UK Parliament constituency); Selby (UK Parliament constituency); South Holland and The Deepings (UK Parliament constituency); Saffron Walden (UK Parliament constituency); Gateshead East and Washington West (UK Parliament constituency); Charnwood (UK Parliament constituency); City of York (UK Parliament constituency); Bradford North (UK Parliament constituency); Eastbourne; Wells; Tyne Bridge (UK Parliament constituency); Penrith and The Border (UK Parliament constituency); Sevenoaks (UK Parliament constituency); Eccles (UK Parliament constituency); Northampton North (UK Parliament constituency); Leicester East (UK Parliament constituency); Banbury (UK Parliament constituency); Daventry (UK Parliament constituency)

Cleanup: Ian Blair; Kilmarnock; Dave Baksh
Merge: Soldering iron; The Leys School; Martin Prince
Add Sources: Moe Baby Blues; ~~Dunfermline and West Fife (UK Parliament constituency)~~; River Cherwell
Wikify: Old Regular Baptist; ~~The Buckinghams~~; Joe Loeffler
Expand: North West Leicestershire (UK Parliament constituency); Sittingbourne and Sheppey (UK Parliament constituency); North Norfolk (UK Parliament constituency)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:61004893O.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:61004893O.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 06:31, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About your Admin Coaching request

Your submission at Admin Coaching has been removed from the request list, as requests where the submitter has not visited the page for at least 6 months (or been inactive for at least 4 months) are removed.

You are welcome to re-submit a request should you wish to, but please note that you are expected to regularly check the page (and to update the "last visited" field of your request) to show your continued interest in the project. If you do re-submit, please carefully re-read the instructions for submission as they may have changed since you last visited!

As noted on the project page, there is an on-going backlog with the project, as so few admins are currently coaching. This means that you may have a long wait for a response (if you receive one at all).

If you no longer require admin coaching, I hope that you continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia!

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 19:07, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

{{unblock-auto|1=194.80.178.253|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "NatDemUK". The reason given for NatDemUK's block is: "Disruptive editing: continued edit-warring and threats.".|3=Rodhullandemu|4=1918462}}

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 16:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Cooltrainer Hugh (talk) 16:49, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David Cameron

I have left a comment about your deletion on the discussion page. I fear I've got better things to do with my time than to pursue this (it isn't that important either way), but, to the extent that you may be one of the main authors of the article, it really does contain a considerable load of trivia and could, in my view, do with (a) a lot of tightening up and (b) greater historical perspective. It has a very journalistic and, to an extent, "Party" feel. IXIA (talk) 21:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stephen Lloyd

That's more like it - putting "I don't think this sentence belongs in Mr Lloyd's article" as the edit summary does look rrather like IDONTLIKEIT. Perhaps you could try to put a bit more of a useful edit summary in future? Of course, you can always put "see talk" and explain it there if you think it needs further explanation. Now in terms of the actual edit - I disagree. The tuition fees vote was very important in political history in the UK, particularly in the context of this coalition government, and deserves a mention - particularly as he voted against his party. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 01:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite alright, I didn't think you did! Thank you. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 15:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolution Revolution AfD

I've merged the substantive bits of Resolution Revolution into British Humanist Association as per the rough consensus that is developing in the AfD. As per WP:NACD, do you want to close it with redirect under the speedy keep rules? If not, you can leave it for the full listing period, see if the consensus changes and have an uninvolved editor or admin close, but it seems a totally uncontroversial case of speedy merge and redirect. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:30, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

File:Zingy dancing.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zingy dancing.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey

Hi,

I've refounded Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey and I saw you were a member of Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey. I was wondering, as you are a on the Participants List weather on not you would like to help improve more Surrey articles and make Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey and active Wikiproject again.

I hope you will come and help make Wikipedia: Wikiproject Surrey an active Wikiproject again.

Thanks, pbl1998--Pbl1998 (talk) 14:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Either reply or Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey on my talk page.

WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion

Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. D B D 17:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eastleigh by-election, 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crewe Town Council

Hello, Cooltrainer Hugh, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Crewe Town Council, appears to be directly copied from http://www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/council_and_democracy/voting_and_elections/electoral_review/crewe_governance_options/outcome_of_the_review.aspx. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Crewe Town Council if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 03:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that Wikipedia can't use material which is only available for noncommercial use. Content has to be available under the CC-BY-SA licence or compatible terms (see Wikipedia:Copyrights). In particular content this allows Wikipedia content to be used commercially. Hut 8.5 19:26, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Christopher Masterson, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 16:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bridge at Cranleigh.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!!!

E-e-bayer_lover (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

And remember to keep the CHRIST in CHRISTmas! E-e-bayer_lover (talk) 22:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banbury Town Hall.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Banbury Town Hall.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cooltrainer Hugh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cooltrainer Hugh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cooltrainer Hugh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cooltrainer Hugh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]