User talk:Coolnick92

Welcome

whats up cool nick coolnick92 my name is jordan.

Hello, Coolnick92, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! MTHarden (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Homosexual panic, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Homosexual panic was changed by Coolnick92 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906577 on 2011-09-15T23:54:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Interior (Talk) 23:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Homosexual panic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- West.andrew.g (talk) 06:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Week 3

I found your article linked from your user page, you left a helpful review, but you left your message on the main article instead of on the talk0 page which appears to others as nonsense. Scores will be posted on Moodle. --MTHarden (talk) 02:16, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Week 6

I found your edit for Dance therapy on your user page instead of a link to the article. I made a few grammar edits on your user page but not on the actual article. You had good information and cited your source but you just ned to a link to the article on your user page. To do this you just need to put two of these -> "[" on either side of "Dance therapy" or use the link key at the top of the edit page. Ewoodruff13 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article Selection

All of your articles are pretty good right now, not real things, or otherwise problematic. So go back and try to choose some article in serious need of improvement. Remember to try to select "stub" class articles, articles for creation, or unassessed articles that are likely stubs. Go back to week 3 and for guides on how to choose articles or communicate with me about it. Don't pick articles that end in phobia, NOS or are about journals. Also, after the article list is posted to the class page you could just add yourself to an article with an empty slot. --MTHarden (talk) 14:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]