Jump to content

User talk:Coolidge30

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: your edits to Puyallup, Washington, would you consider creating the article for Gertrude Wilhelmsen? That would help establish the individual as notable under WikiPedia's definition under WP:BIO. Please be sure to provide links to third-party reliable sources in the new article. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 14:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected Joseph Wurzelbacher to United States presidential election debates, 2008#October 15: Third presidential debate (Hofstra University – Hempstead, New York) per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe the Plumber. You may want to merge the information from here to the debate page. Cheers, Cunard (talk) 04:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Robert B. Carleson Eagle Fund requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 08:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of American Civil Rights Union for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Civil Rights Union is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Civil Rights Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jonnymoon96 (talk) 22:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]