Jump to content

User talk:Coolavokig

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #2142689 lifted or expired. Just so we're clear, nobody is saying you are the same user, this was simply collateral damage from a block of an user that apparently used the same ip or ip range as you.

Request handled by: Beeblebrox (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

I strongly reject this claim. I am not Oriel36 and never used that username. My record as a contributor to Wikipedia since 2006 is unblemished. I have at all times tried to be constructive and to adhere to Wikipedia's rules. Coolavokig (talk) 19:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Coolavokig's Talk Page. You are welcome to leave your comments here concerning articles I have made contributions to - as long as your comments are constructive. Coolavokig (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St. Finbarr's Cemetery

[edit]

Good start on St. Finbarr's Cemetery but what about a photo? Cheers ww2censor 18:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP TDs

[edit]

In relation to your recent edits to a number of pages of people who were once members of the WP. While I can understand why you removed these people from the category, the policy on Wikipedia is to give all the party affiliations of people. If we were just to list people according to the parties they are currently in or ended up in, we'd have to depopulate the category for Democratic Left for example. Might I suggest that a category be made for Former WP politicians?--Damac 13:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cathal Goulding

[edit]

Please stop changing the date of birth. After it being unsourced for basically forever, I've finally sourced it from here as 30 December 1922. Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 06:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added obviously incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 07:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tomás Mac Giolla

[edit]

A chara, yer gonna need a soures ta put dat in de article.--Vintagekits 15:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mother Jones

[edit]

Hi Coolavokig, do you have a source for her being born in Blarney Street? [1] Cheers, --Bookandcoffee 19:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I know it was published in a book called, I think "Day by Day in Cork" by the late Seán Beecher, which I have somewhere but am trying to locate. I wrote an article about her for a small local newsletter a few years ago and used Beecher as the source, I think I also referenced it to a Cork based annual publication called "The Holly Bough" which comes out every year before Christmas. I know it is a fact that she was born in Blarney Street, but I suppose I should have researched and provided the reference from the beginning. Thanks. Coolavokig 16:11, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, your recent edit [2] quoted "established convention", do you have a reference for this, it looks like I need to brush up on my wikiquette, Thanks Fasach Nua 14:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The convention I speak of refers to the fact that other prominent Irish people born before the 1922 Anglo-Irish Treaty are listed as having being born in "Ireland" not the United Kingdom or the United Kingdom of Great Britain of Ireland. I would cite the entries concerning just a few such people for example Michael Collins, George Bernard Shaw, Seán Lemass, Theobald Wolfe Tone or even Lord Kitchener. All were born before the establishment of the Irish Free State and its successor state. Each and everyone has "Ireland" simply as their birthplace. This amounts to convention. Now please stop changing the birthplace for Mary Harris to Cork, UK as this is the incorrect form. Coolavokig 16:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think having a different rule for Irish born people, than for the rest of planet is a tad inconsistant, if you look at other biographic entries, they list countries as they were at the time of birth, not as they are now.
I have reverted your edit, and suggest if you feel strongly about the matter to take it up with WP:IMOS or WP:MOSBIOFasach Nua 09:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that then surely in the name of consistency you should also change the entry style for Kitchener, Michael Collins, GB Shaw, etc, etc. Since you are the person who made the original change to Mother Jones you and not I are the person who should take it up with WP:IMOS if you feel so strongly about it. In the meantime I am reverting it back to what it was before your first edit thus reverting to the situation that existed before this dispute began. Coolavokig 09:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your free images

[edit]

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is however another Wikimedia foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading media there instead. That way, all the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons. Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!

Sfan00 IMG 13:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please come and help out over here - pick one article and try and improve it!!

[edit]
The Irish Republicanism WikiProject is a collaboration of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of Irish republicanism, Irish nationalism, and related organizations, peoples, and other topics.

(For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProject and the Guide to WikiProjects).

--Vintagekits 19:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Northern Ireland

[edit]

I dont really know what you are getting at, so I could be wrong, but I altered your comment [3]. I never changed the meaning of someones comments on a talk page as dramatically as this, but it does look like a typo Fasach Nua 11:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Obviously it is a typo. Coolavokig 21:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I see you have some photo problems! Check it out. (Sarah777 19:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Cathal Goulding's date of birth (again)

[edit]

I have once again reverted changes to the birth date of Cathal Goulding (1923-1998). The obituaries of early 1999 were wrong. The correct date is as stated in 1923. This has been confirmed by members of Cathal's family and sourced in a Workers' Party publication of 1999. Coolavokig (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't see the parallel. Cathal Goulding's date of birth isn't like a religion or ethnicity - it is a matter of fact, not conjecture. Coolavokig (talk) 16:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich Hertz

[edit]

Please consider re-visiting Talk:Heinrich Hertz#jewish ancestry. I'd be interested in your feedback about the suggested edit strategy I've proposed. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Halligan (Irish socialist politician)

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article John Halligan (Irish socialist politician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of John Halligan (Irish socialist politician). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ballinacurra

[edit]

You're right. My bad :-) I didn't think about other Ballinacurras when I moved the article. I've moved it again to Ballinacurra, County Cork, since the naming convention appears to be "County" rather than "Co." All the best, Bláthnaid 15:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I'm intending to create an article on Tom French fairly soon, provided I can find sufficient reliable sources; I'd also be quite happy to see anyone else create an article. I considered that as the former leader of a significant party in Ireland, there should be no question over his notability. Do you have any useful sources? I created an article on John Lowry a while ago and struggled to find sources beyond his election results. Warofdreams talk 13:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Ballyporeen

[edit]

Good that you have corrected it, but my main point remains - you should have tagged the sentence with the [citation needed] tag and not have made your point with bold text. Syferus (talk) 12:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Coolavokig! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Des O'Hagan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Marian Donnelly - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you be so kind as to give us support!

[edit]

Hello, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I've just read your profile and I understood that you're an Irishman (I wish I can visit your wonderful country some time soon!), so can you understand what are a minorized language and culture and maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm a member of a Catalan association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT. Supporting us will be like giving equal opportunity to minorized languages and cultures in the future! Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! Keep on preserving your great culture, country, music and language! Slán agat! Capsot (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clonmult Ambush & WP:ARBCOM/TROUBLES

[edit]

Hi Coolavoki. I've removed the list of names you added to the above article for two reasons. First, per WP:NOTMEMORIAL we don't generally include casualty rolls; an exception is often made for notable individuals, but not for entire casualty lists. Secondly the tone of the edit was not neutral. The title "Roll of honour", the listing of only IRA dead and the assumption that the execution allegations are true all added up give the impression that the article is sympathetic to the IRA position. The point of our core neutrality policy is that Wikipedia has no opinion, either for or against. Just so you're aware, if you intend to work in this area in future you need to be more careful; all articles related to "The Troubles" fall under a 2007 Arbitration Committee restriction (set out at WP:ARBCOM/TROUBLES). All the best and thank you for your other work, EyeSerenetalk 18:39, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Harris Jones

[edit]

Hi. Those three sentences at Mary Harris Jones are very confusing - at least they confused me! They seem to say she lost "her entire family" - which I had assumed included her husband - to yellow fever in 1867. It then says she lost her home, shop and possessions in the fire without mentioning her husband. I don't doubt you're correct about what happened but those sentences should be rewritten somehow. Station1 (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably right. After checking a number of other sources it is now clear that the first, and major turning point for Mary Harris Jones was the deaths of her husband and their four children in the yellow fever epidemic of 1867. The second event, the Great Fire of Chicago, was four years later in 1871. Thanks for drawing to my attention. 06:46, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Coolavokig (talk) 06:47, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Coolavokig/George Lashwood has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Lashwood, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 17:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
George Lashwood, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 15:19, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited George Lashwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gramophone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erna Sellmer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Bernard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of oldest radio stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Coolavokig, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cobh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glenville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Karl Spindler (German navy), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jamesx12345 (talk) 13:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ULA Today

[edit]

I replied to your comment on the ULA Talk page. CivisHibernius (talk) 01:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Linda Kavanagh for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda Kavanagh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Kavanagh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SageGreenRider (talk) 04:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ted Tynan for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ted Tynan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Tynan (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Murry1975 (talk) 00:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Des O'Hagan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Down. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Coolavokig. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Coolavokig. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ballymanus mine disaster has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ballymanus mine disaster. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ballymanus mine disaster has been accepted

[edit]
Ballymanus mine disaster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Coolavokig. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Coolavokig. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Tynanted.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:MacGiolla Belfast Nov06.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]