User talk:Cool as a Cuke

Welcome!

Hello, Cool as a Cuke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Blake Gripling (talk) 04:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Joseph

I think you're taking things a bit too far on the talk page. It's fine to not be happy with the situation but there's no need to attack User:Cricket02. External links to joseph's site are perfectly valid in the context of articles about him. You might not be a fan of Joseph's music but you're not the only non-fan here, essentially it's a decent wikipedia article. It only comes across so positive because there seems to be little coverage of his work and it's only positive. Wikipedia can only put something in the perspective that third parties have shown it.

I think we should just leave him in his obscurity and move on. Also, I think you should remove the comments you made here as a courtesy to Cricket. Thanks. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 17:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for crossing it out but I never said you had to love the guy and his music, for heavens sake he still makes dog music! :) Sillyfolkboy (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be mean. Joseph makes music for all animals of the domesticated pet variety, not just dogs! - Cool as a Cuke (talk) 00:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Please don't make personal attacks against other editors or ex-editors, as you did here.[1] There was no need at all to make these remarks here and now. If you are not ware of this policy, you can check WP:NPA. Fram (talk) 20:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia improvement

Hi Cool as a Cuke(I was going to say "caac" but that doesn't work!), just a recommendation: You seem to have not found a particular area you're interested in, in wikipedia terms. You should think about what interests you, what are you knowledgable about; there are many types of Wikiprojects you can participate in and endless clean up tasks too, if it interests you. One of the beautiful things about wikipedia is that you don't have to be an expert on Einstein or gravitational theory to contribute - there are many modern culture articles to work on too. So, to use Bill's saying: where to you want to go today? Sillyfolkboy (talk) 03:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please redact the last sentance of this

[2]. Accurate but entirely unhelpful to your argument/the DRV. Thanks, Viridae ^Talk 23:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why? I have seen other sockpuppets gleefully lambasted for their points of logic, on the basis of their being a sockpuppet. Why does Joshua get a free pass? -- Cool as a Cuke (talk) 23:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It simply doesn't help the argument Viridae ^Talk 23:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll be more crafty. -- Cool as a Cuke (talk) 00:00, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]