User talk:Contributor6832

November 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Contributor6832 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I confirm that I'm not a sock puppet of Sekanaya12. I'm a contributor (and user, and... donator) of Wikipedia since a few years, I don' t understand why I've been blocked. I've just seen some clear & coordinate vandalism/non-neutral addings on HEC Paris english & french page last Friday and tried to correct them, maybe I did it wrongly, please excuse me.

Decline reason:

Based on the reported technical evidence and the behavioral evidence, this is a clear socking situation. only (talk) 15:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For the reviewing admin: I made the block here, but this account has been confirmed by a CU: it was not solely a behavioral block. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't understand what's going on here... Please explain me what's happening (with understandable words if possible...Contributor6832

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Contributor6832 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is incredible, I repeat that I'm not a "sock puppet" and that I don't use multiple accounts. Am I talking with humans or bots ?

Decline reason:

You're talking with humans. Your account is technically linked to a bunch of other accounts who happen to share your interests, see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sekanaya12. You will need to explain that. Huon (talk) 20:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Contributor6832

Why should I explain links with accounts I don't know & interests I'm not aware of ? In a word, why should I explain my innocence ? Look more carefully at your data. Or explain your own links & interests. Very disappointed by this area of Wikipedia community. Contributor6832 (talk) 23:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]