User talk:Consuls.feints

September 2024

Hello! I'm TyphoonAmpil. Your recent edit(s) to the page Arenivaga tonkawa appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 05:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such a technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. FifthFive (talk) 06:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I understand the importance of ensuring that all contributions to Wikipedia meet the platform's guidelines and maintain high standards of accuracy and neutrality.

I would like to clarify that while I used tools to assist in drafting content, I carefully reviewed the edits before submitting them to ensure they were factual, well-referenced, and aligned with Wikipedia's standards. My intent is always to contribute constructively to the community, and I value feedback to improve my approach.

Moving forward, I will ensure even more thorough reviews of my contributions and make use of the sandbox for any further experimentation. I appreciate your guidance and will take extra care to follow Wikipedia’s best practices.

Thank you again for your understanding and for your efforts in maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. Thanks. Consuls.feints (talk) 06:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And your reply is AI generated - not very helpful. Please don't continue blindly copy and paste - output from LLMs may appear good at first glance, but often has major issues. It also puts a burden on contributors who have to look through the large edits to determine if they're constructive or not. FifthFive (talk) 06:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern and appreciate the feedback. My intent was to contribute constructively, and I’ll be more mindful moving forward by ensuring any edits are fully reviewed and original. Thanks for pointing it out. Consuls.feints (talk) 06:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RevisionSuccess (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GrabUp was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are not WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RevisionSuccess and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 11:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Consuls.feints! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GrabUp - Talk 11:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RevisionSuccess (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RevisionSuccess and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]