User talk:Connorgurney1

This is Connorgurney1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello, connorgurney1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) Join WER 18:44, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Connorgurney1 (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Connorgurney1, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Connorgurney1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll see you down there! :)

You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

Deleted article

Hi, Connor. Sorry for delay in responding. First of all, have you read the guidelines on notability and verifiability? If not, a quick glance should let you know why your article on AristotleTec was deleted and will probably never be suitable for inclusion - or at least, not for a few years yet. Also, there is guidance on conflicts of interest, which would appear to be relevant here. However, the reason for deletion is that the article contained no actual information. Okay, there was an information box indicating that it was meant to be about a company, but no actual text. You should use the sandbox for experiments and test pages before transferring them to article space. I hope this helps. Deb (talk) 08:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance required

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Two questions:

How can I rename a page?
Is it against rules to remove items from a talk page as it is getting long?

Connorgurney1 (talk) 13:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Connorgurney1, I have two answers.

See WP:MOVE (make sure you read the "Before you move a page" section)
Yes, technically speaking. Long talk pages should be archived rather than simply deleted. See WP:ARCHIVE for more info.

If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2016 Berlin Car Bomb (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Questionably notable for WP:EVENT, still needs any further available in-depth third-party news sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2016 Berlin Car Bomb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]