User talk:ConnorMcLeod theONE

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Ajaxverifier (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No sock puppet.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ConnorMcLeod theONE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Mark_Arsten please give your reasons/evidence for blocking me - beyond 'suspected sock puppet of Ajaxverifier'. I am not and this is completely out of order.ConnorMcLeod theONE (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Seems pretty clear. You'll need to provide a better explanation of your actions. Kuru (talk) 02:22, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Interesting how you blocked me within 5 minutes of my last activity but you can't reply in a short amount of time!

So am I to assume it's just a coincidence that with your first edit you made the same edit was Ajaxverifier and his other socks had been making? I'm sorry, but I have a very hard time believing that's a coincidence. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]