User talk:CondenserCoil

September 2012

Your recent edit to the page PopCap Games contains an edit summary that appears to have triggered the abuse filter. The summary may have contained inappropriate text such as a highly repetitive character sequence, profanity, gibberish, or all-caps. Please use appropriate edit summaries to tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. If your summary did not contain such text, please report it to the false positives page and remove this message. Thank you. MacAddct1984 ^{(talk  contribs)} 20:36, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

pffffffffthahaha

Ripping off Miles of SmashWiki, I see. Avengingbandit 13:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pfffffthahaha, using bad grammar, I see. CondenserCoil (talk) 13:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How is that bad grammar? Avengingbandit 17:18, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editing your comments, I see. CondenserCoil (talk) 19:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problem? Avengingbandit 03:20, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Xmas Number One 1980

Can I ask you why you consider St Winifreds to have been the Xmas No 1 in 1980 when it didn't reach the top spot until 27/12, according to www.everyhit.com? Is it because you dispute this fact? Or you believe that this constitutes "the week in which Christmas Day fell that year"?

Presumably you believe that if a record reached No 1 on 10 April say, then it was No 1 for the week before up until that day, announced retrospectively? I, however, think of it as being the number 1 for the following week, even though it's position is based entirely on sales from the week before.

Mike Smith ran a phone-in quiz in the early 1980s, and one question was the Xmas No 1 for 1980. Although the contestant insisted it was St Winifred's, Mr Smith refused to accept it as it had only reached No 1 after Xmas. This was also a question in a quiz I recently attended in which the quiz master said John Lennon was the correct answer. Then again, there was another year when I remember hearing it said on Radio 1 that the Xmas No 1 wouldn't be known until the day after Xmas!

So I guess different people have different definitions!

Cheers Macclad2010 Macclad2010 (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I cross-checked it with other pages on Wikipedia, including the pages for both songs, and they all said that St. Winifred's was the number one. Condenser Coil 19:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed they do but they could all be equally wrong. This song's wiki page (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/There%27s_No_One_Quite_Like_Grandma) says it was No 1 from 27 Dec to 3 Jan whereas all other sites I've seen (including another wiki site) say it spent 2 weeks at the top, so an apparent error. This page says it was the Xmas No 1 despite also stating that it was only No 1 for the week 27 Dec to 3 Jan. This doesn't make sense to me although I may be missing something. Can you explain why this would be considered "the week in which Christmas Day fell that year"?

Thanks Macclad2010 (talk) 20:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the United Kingdom, Christmas number ones are singles that are top of the UK Singles Chart in the week in which Christmas Day falls.
— List of UK Singles Chart Christmas number ones, a certain Wikipedia article

Condenser Coil 21:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CondenserCoil. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CondenserCoil. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Take part in a survey

Hi CondenserCoil

We're working to measure the value of Wikipedia in economic terms. We want to ask you some questions about how you value being able to edit Wikipedia.

Our survey should take about 10-15 minutes of your time. We hope that you will enjoy it and find the questions interesting. All answers will be kept strictly confidential and will be anonymized before the aggregate results are published. Regretfully, we can only accept responses from people who live in the US due to restrictions in our grant-based funding.

As a reward for your participation, we will randomly pick 1 out of every 5 participants and give them $25 worth of goods of their choice from the Wikipedia store (e.g. Wikipedia themed t-shirts). Note that we can only reward you if you are based in the US.

Click here to access the survey: https://mit.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0xE0vVW1MclX1d3

Thanks

Avi

Researcher, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy --Avi gan (talk) 02:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CondenserCoil. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CondenserCoil. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Genshin Impact, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Generally, it is not a good idea to include "easter egg" links. It may be better to add a footnote to explain what each term means. Aasim (talk) 08:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The term used in the original Chinese version is "仙", which is the page I linked to. Condenser Coil 15:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]