User talk:Concord113

Hi! Thanks for your new article. It looks great. If you would like to start a "draft" of an article, the directions are at Wikipedia:Subpages. For example, you could start your article in User:Concord113/Chateau de Pompignan. The article you did was actually in the main space (i.e., it has been "submitted"), so I have moved it to its correct title... I hope you don't mind! Please keep working on it, it's very good. Thanks for your work and welcome to Wikipedia! -IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 01:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ICA - Thanks for noticing (how...?), and comments. I hadn't realised it was in the main space yet, as I'm still working on basic input and learning markup, and I didn't want obvious corrections at this stage as I've just put some notes in later as markers for me. I just lost a messy link & comment while it was changed. Suppose I should put up a work-in-progress template, but haven't found the right one yet. But thanks again, nice to know someone cares. Concord113 (talk) 01:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ICA - Later - added link successfully from edit conflict page, and learned a bit more, including about you. Fair do's! Concord113 (talk) 01:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you speak French a bit!

Concord mon vieux,

I noticed you did a lot of work at French landscape garden. It is good I think but I have added a lot of links and so forth, and tried to tie it up with the article at René Louis de Girardin and Botanical gardens which we got to GA about a year ago. It seems to me that it is not quite so good idiomatic English as my French is comme une vache espanol, so I have reworded it a little but I hope I have not changed anything to be wrong, so if you could please cast your eye over it some time that would be great. I will continue to work on the article but please, s.v.p., anything I have changed wrongly, please change it back.

Thank you

S.

Hi Simon, nice to hear from you. I'm still new at this, so bear with me. I've reverted your edit, and reworded my original a bit. I've given a ref for their friendship, and while it's not proof, there is more (but no time now).

I've kept most of my words, and hope I can justify them. The buildings weren't really odd, or even eyecatching as such, though they may appear so now to us. They were designed into specific areas of the parc a fabriques (I've called this the park; to distinguish between the entire demesne on the one hand, and the several different types of gardens within the demesne on the other). The follies each created little scenes or evoked moods such as inspiration or melancholy. I've used 'walks' rather than 'paths', because they were specific routes designed in line with whatever was being attempted in the way of affect or effect. Mount Parnassus - the home of the Muses - was interpreted with some literalness, for example: there was a mound all right, and with a good view, but it was surrounded by a typical estate wall and pillared gateway, as if it were a perfectly ordinary (for the times) manor house. You had to have a key to get in.

As for picturesque, what can I say? It seems appropriate; and some follies were designed to be (and remain) mysterious - a 'Gaulish' temple, for example, evoking reverence, but without a known (actually non-existent) religious background ...

I hope this is OK with you, but feel free to improve. Or discuss.

I like the page on French landscape gardens, and may have refs and things to contribute to it later.

PS - I do actually claim to be a native English speaker, though of a non-British dialect. Also French to a useful level.

PPS We need to standardise section heads to minuscules after first cap.

A plus - A (Concord113 (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Ayesha al-Gaddafi — Idi Amin marriage

Can you please tell me the reason you removed my additions regarding the marriage between Ayesha al-Gaddafi — Idi Amin? Was it breaking any Wikipedia policies? Do you have references indicating it wasn't true? Gabiteodoru (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, G, meant to drop you a line on this. Ayesha was born in 1976 and Amin stayed from April 79 to sometime in 1980. Unlikely that they were married, and no evidence. Just can't see the Colonel marrying his 3-yo daughter to a dictator - no matter how wonderful - who had just lost his country and was lucky to find permanent exile.

Your reference is not directly accessible, so I don't know what it says, but if it claimed they were married I'd have to question its reliability. I'm still trying to find out the name of the guy she did marry, at the age of 30. In Wikipedia it's not really a question of showing that something isn't the case, more the provision of evidence that it is. Hope that's OK - It would be very interesting indeed to the whole world if there were any credible evidence of this marriage. Concord113 (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reference I added is: http://www.yalibnan.com/2011/03/06/who-are-gaddafi%E2%80%99s-children/ -- is this not working for you? If it does work, is it not trustworthy enough?

Although I'm starting to think that maybe somebody added it to Wikipedia as a joke, and used an offline reference for it, and now many websites just quoted the Wikipedia one. Anyway, I think I'd best leave it up to you -- if you do decide that the sources aren't good enough, please also remove it from the Idi Amin page. Gabiteodoru (talk) 17:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had checked out the Ya Libnan website before deleting. Again, I just can't see it as reliable. It reads: "Muammar Gaddafi was a close supporter of former Ugandan President Idi Amin. In gratitude, Amin married Gaddafi’s daughter Aisha while in Libya, but she then divorced him." No author is credited, and no source given for the information. It's just so unlikely, and so remarkable if true, that I think it needs much harder evidence before being mentioned at all. I've removed it from the Amin page as well. Hope that's OK; I'd be happy to look at more evidence.Concord113 (talk) 23:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are your credentials to categorize a website as unreliable for Wikipedia's purposes? Tapered (talk) 23:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't mean to categorise the whole website as unreliable, merely this unsourced, uncorroborated and unlikely info. I'd be the last person to assert any link between guilt and association. More generally though, I do feel myself qualified to pronounce on the reliability of any website, because I can test it for myself, against other sources and on its own track record over time. And haven't we all read about living people and reliable sources? Concord113 (talk) 00:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Silencio (song by Rafael Hernández) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Nard

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Concord113 (talk) 18:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mughal Empire may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Lodi]] in the first [[Battle of Panipat (1526)]]. It reached its peak extent under [Aurangzeb]], and declined rapidly after his death (in 1707) under a series of ineffective rulers. The empire's
|last=Wilson Hunter |title=The Indian Empire: Its People, History, and Products |page=315}}</ref>)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Demographics of Iran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Armenian, Kurdish, Balochi, Gilaki, Persian, Kartvelian, Brahui and Mazandarani

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Concord113. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Concord113. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Concord113. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Concord113. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]