Jump to content

User talk:ColtPamella23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, ColtPamella23, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 21:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aurora Party of Alaska (September 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey!
Thank you for the feedback. The reason I am confused is because I modeled this article off of the Party Party of Rhode Island article, which has 3 references as well and most are government websites, similar to the ones on this draft. I know I’m new to Wikipedia (I tried when I was younger without an account but was horrible at it) so I’m just wondering what specifically I could do better.
Thanks!
Colt ColtPamella23 (talk) 21:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, unfortunately basing what is OK based off other articles rather than guidelines and policies is not always a great strategy (unless it's marked as a Good article etc). We still have a lot of sub-standard articles to be improved or deleted. Party Party of Rhode Island is not a good article example and if you look at the creators page it's littered with Nominations for deletion and as presented does not show why the subject is notable. However once an articles is in 'main-space' it requires a check of external sources so see if the subject is notable before sending to deletion, rather than in draft when it is up to the submitter to show notability. It's too late and I'm too tired to check it now but Party Party of Rhode Island looks to be dubiously notable and I would not be surprised to see it deleted. As for your own submission it does not have enough coverage to show notability with just one basic listing and one other source. If there are more independent reliable sources with significant coverage please add and resubmit, otherwise it may be that its just too soon. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, I understand what you are saying. I was pretty surprised that it was an article (I’ve read Wikipedia all my life and I rarely read things like that). Thank you so much for explaining it to me!! ColtPamella23 (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, ColtPamella23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

Yamla (talk) 10:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]