User talk:ColonelKillEm
Welcome!
|
Reference errors on 18 December
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the 2012 Alabama Crimson Tide football team page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hey man, you need to be careful about using non-neutral language in the Patriots article you've been editing. You said the Pats' 41–0 lead against the Jets was laughable, which it may have been to Patriots fans, but that's a subjective opinion and Wikipedia has strict rules about making sure we maintain a neutral tone. Check out WP:NPOV for more info. – PeeJay 18:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Can I also ask why you insist on saying things like "their own- 43"? There's no need for a hyphen there, at any time, so please stop adding one. – PeeJay 11:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well, what you "feel like" doing is both irrelevant and makes for a worse encyclopaedia. I tried to be nice about this, but now I'm not, so just stop it or I'll report you for making personal attacks. – PeeJay 19:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- It's bad grammar, and bad grammar makes the page look bad. – PeeJay 20:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- What other pages do is irrelevant. A wrong thing is still wrong no matter how many people think it's right. – PeeJay 21:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks. Also, you don't need to create a new section every time you leave a message on someone's talk page, especially if you're just going to title the section with gibberish. Just leave the message in the same section as the initial one. – PeeJay 14:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- What other pages do is irrelevant. A wrong thing is still wrong no matter how many people think it's right. – PeeJay 21:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- It's bad grammar, and bad grammar makes the page look bad. – PeeJay 20:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well, what you "feel like" doing is both irrelevant and makes for a worse encyclopaedia. I tried to be nice about this, but now I'm not, so just stop it or I'll report you for making personal attacks. – PeeJay 19:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, ColonelKillEm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)