User talk:Collision787

Welcome!

Hello, Collision787, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Ymblanter (talk) 10:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of Korea

Please see: Template talk:History of Korea#Recent edit warring .28July 2013.29 Thank you. Isitall (talk) 19:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Collision787. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. AGK [•] 18:46, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask the release

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Collision787 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have made a mistake from lack of one's knowledge.

Decline reason:

Before we go any further, you need to provide a complete list of all the accounts you have created. PhilKnight (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Collision787 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

list of all the accounts Gija Wiman FourCommanderiesofHan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Captain o Captain (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))Galaxy Mohammed (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))--Collision787 (talk

Decline reason:

(1) Thanks for that list, it is a step forward, but there are further issues to address before a decision on a possible unblock can be made. (2) Are you sure that you have listed all of your accounts? For example, Isitall looks very much like you, too. (3) Apart from the issue of multiple accounts, there have been other problems, such as edit warring, refusal to accept consensus, and possibly editing to promote a point of view. Can you say in what ways your future editing will be different from your past editing, if you are unblocked? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Collision787 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(2)Isitall is not me to swear.(3)I am sorry that I gave all of you a great trouble deeply heartily. I review a policy of Wiki and adopt the opinion of all of you and edit it faithfully and carefully and promise that I contribute to Wiki.--Collision787 (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.