User talk:CollegeSportsGuy

Mid-major

I moved Missouri Valley to Mid-Major Basketball program, seems like its one of the leagues that define the name. FancyPants 05:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

What is your reason for changing references to University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee to the less official and less informative UW-Milwaukee? --mtz206 (talk) 11:27, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

You state on this edit they are referred to as UW-Milwaukee or UWM for "all NCAA purposes." I don't know what you're referring to, but they are listed at the official NCAA website [1] as "University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee". --mtz206 (talk) 11:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

The list you refer to is a "member institution list", as it states at the top of the page. All NCAA Division I school's full name's are there, including the University of North Carolina, Charlotte and University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. If you don't like the fact that many school's such as Charlotte, Chattanooga and Milwaukee choose to use a shorter name for their NCAA TEAMS (not institutions), I don't know what to tell you. It's pretty commonly accepted by everyone else that some universities with longer names (Georgia Tech, Virginia Tech, Texas Tech, and particularly state U campus's like Wisconsin, North Carolina, Arkansas, Colorado, etc.) do this. Milwaukee has simply decided to do the same.

And I don't see how it's less informative. It's considered common knowledge what state a city the size of Milwaukee is in. Do you think that university's that use similar abbreviations such as UNC Charlotte (a smaller city than Milwaukee), or even an accepted abbreviation such as UAB, are also "less informative" than their full institution's name? CollegeSportsGuy 12:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

My concern is that you're making statements like "Milwaukee has simply decided to do the same" and I haven't seen any evidence that they actually did make some kind of official decisions to change how they are referred to. And since many of the articles you have changed have nothing to do with NCAA atheletics, it seems odd to suddenly change "...received a degree from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee" to "...from UW-Milwaukee" since it is most likely that the degree itself states the former. If you want to change it for articles referring to sports events, that might make sense. Otherwise it seems in appropriate. --mtz206 (talk) 13:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Did you do any sort of looking at all? They refer to themselves singularly as Milwaukee all over their official university athletics site. I can easily provide a cite from Milwaukee's athletics site if you wish, one that is an official press release which also states unnacceptable names and abbreviations for the institution (which includes "Wisconsin-Milwaukee").

I'm wondering, since this is an encyclopedia, and therefore continuity is of utmost importance, if these updates are unnacceptable to you do you intend to revise all references of institutions by their choosen brand TEAM names in Wikipedia articles? Such as (in order of most recently changed) UT-Chattanooga's change to simply Chattanooga, UNC Charlotte's Charlotte, University of Alabama at Birmingham's UAB? I'm curious as to why you have a problem with just this one university. (I also see you live in outstate Wisconsin)

As far as degrees go, UCLA's degree's don't say UCLA, but article's about schools that have long, often confusing or clumsy names ALWAYS refer to the INSTITUTION'S preferred abbreviation, which is in this case UW-Milwaukee. That can also be found on their official athletics site AND university site.

I am most concerned that you seem to be automatically making this change in any article with any reference to UWM. See [2] and [3]. Your argument seems mostly based on their athletic web site and how they're referenced in NCAA tournaments, etc. But many of these articles have nothing to do with athletics, and it isn't obvious at all what "UW" refers to. The burden is on you to support making such a change, since I see no harm whatsoever in the current version of most of these articles to spell out the official name of the university. In short, why make the change at all? (We're not worried about # of characters here) --mtz206 (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Similarly, I see no reason to purposefully change a link to point to a redirect to the original link. --mtz206 (talk) 17:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

I understand that the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee is often referred to as "Milwaukee" these days for purposes of athletics, but I see no reason for you to replace the proper, spelled-out version on tons of non-athletic related pages with the less specific and formal "UW-Milwaukee" which is only a redirect. --BaronLarf 17:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Howdy CollegeSportsGuy. Just to chime in here, the university name should be spelled out in full, at least initially, and abbreviations introduced afterwards. We should strive to make the encyclopedia as universally-understandable as possible (keeping a 'worldview' in mind). Thanks for contributing. --Fang Aili ^talk 19:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

I can see and understand the WIKI's concern here. I stand corrected, a university's name should be spelled out at first mention in non-athletics articles.

Obviously for athletics-related articles, school's with longer, hyphenated names, such as the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, go by their preferred name (if applicable), even at first mention, i.e. Charlotte, Wisonsin, Minnesota, Virginia Tech, UAB, Indiana, Michigan, UCLA, etc.

I think we're all in agreement as to what is the standard now. Thanks guys! CollegeSportsGuy 06:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Noticed this revert of yours: [4], which is fine. But I question your edit summary that this is the "most commonly referred to name (by students, area residents, etc." One, you have no statistical evidence for such a claim, and two, I strongly suspect that if you polled 1000 people in Milwaukee, the most common term would be "UW-M." (I lived near the campus for 7 years). Just something to chew on. Cheers. --MichaelZimmer (talk) 16:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

They were called UW-Milwaukee at the times of both tournaments, and therefore thats how they should be labeled. Texas Western is now UTEP, but do we change the Texas Western Championship in the 60s to UTEP? Names should be labeled as they were when the tournament took place. We also don't change the Minneapolis Lakers championships to Los Angeles. Make sense? I'm as big an NCAA Tournament as anyone, so when I change something on a public site it is for the better good. Thanks. Airtuna08 17:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't buy it, look at the UW-Milwaukee webpage. They are refered to UWM in all of their archives, including the two tourney runs in 2005 and 2006. Also, the newspaper brackets in 05 and 06 refer to them as Wisconsin-Milwaukee, which I have and can scan for you if you want. If you want to use Wisconsin as your defense, Madison is the home school and has always been refered to as Wisconsin. I can point out many other state schools as examples. University of Illinois-Urbana has always been Illinois. Illinois-Chicago is a sister school, but is called Illinois-Chicago, not Chicago. I'd like to see a webpage or some supporting evidence that they have changed their name, because you don't even have the exact date you say this happened. I think you are confused when you see Milwaukee as it is used as a shortened version. Airtuna08 20:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Again, you offer no proof of them changing their team name. The link you sent me has Milwaukee refered to as UW-Milwaukee. EDIT I see they don't like Wisconsin-Milwaukee, but your suggestion of Milwaukee is just one of their accepted uses. I'd still use UW-Milwaukee as that is the most official name. http://uwmpanthers.cstv.com/sports/m-baskbl/archive/wiml-m-baskbl-archive.html Look at the link! UWMpanthers, not milwaukeepanthers.cstv. That link comes directly from the UW-Milwaukee website. Feel free to search the links on the page there. Airtuna08 20:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

I work in the athletic dept for UW-Milwaukee. Keep it that way in the brackets, as we were referred to in 2005 and 2006. That is the way we are referred to now as well. Use Milwaukee in supporting graphs, etc. Not on the official NCAA Tournament brackets or at the beginning of a game summary. Thank you. UWMSports 05:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm glad to see you are such a fan of us though, ever been to U.S. Cellular Arena? UWMSports 05:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

We know you claim to work there, but we have no evidence that that is the case. Orange Mike 05:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC) (in the EMS lab)

And you know I'm not how? Why don't you gander at these official brackets from ncaasports.com
http://www.ncaasports.com/basketball/mens/brackets/viewable/2005/DI
http://www.ncaasports.com/basketball/mens/brackets/viewable/2006/DI
So you would think on an official bracket by ncaasports if they could abbreviate to just Milwaukee they would. But they respect our wishes and keep Wisconsin in front of us. Thanks, and have a good one. UWMSports 15:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC) (in my SID office)

See above, enough said! Airtuna08 22:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC) http://uwmpanthers.cstv.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/041207aaa.html If they were referred to as just Milwaukee, you think they may have used "Milwaukee" at least once! Show me this mid 90s switch to "Milwaukee" you speak of, stop throwing out random dates. Airtuna08 22:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

http://www.allcoachnetwork.com/pearl/bio.html (Official Coaches History Website/Refers to Pearl's years at UWM as "UW-Milwaukee"UWMSports 04:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Public universities are typically chartered by the state legislature, and their "official names" are set in state laws. Websites are usually not a reliable indicator of the official name of anything. Racepacket (talk) 12:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Historical references

I think the work you're doing is generally useful; however, I would be careful about changing pages which are strictly historical in nature. For example, at 1966 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament, we say that Texas Western won the title, and I would very strongly oppose any change to UTEP in that article... (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm in agreement on this point. I believe Milwaukee started referring to themselves as "Milwaukee" in the 1990's before they made any NCAA Div-I tournament, so I think we're safe in this case. CollegeSportsGuy 13:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

EDIT - Upon further research, it appears the NCAA uses old names of universities, but not old "team" names, in their records. Milwaukee did not change their university name like Missouri St. or UTEP did. Instead, they simply dropped the state university part of their name, exactly as UNC-Charlotte and UT-Chattanooga have done. These schools, that were in the past known by their full name for athletics, now appear listed by only their current athletics name for all past achievements as "Charlotte" and "Chattanooga". Milwaukee would therefore follow suit, as their athletics name has changed, but the university name remains the same. CollegeSportsGuy 07:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

History of Names

Hi CollegeSportsGuy. I agree with the result of the neverending debate on school naming, and I know you're aware of the neverending UWM reverts. I do have a couple of points though that I'd like to hear your thoughts on:

1. What do we do with names from the past? For instance, when Missouri State was in the Mid-Con, they were Southwest Missouri State. Since in all Mid-Con records and context they were SWMS, shouldn't they be listed by that name in former members, with a note about their current name and of course linking to the current name of the school.
2. The acronyms are a little troubling to me. I understand that for most, especially in a Midwest context, UIC is University of Illinois at Chicago, but isn't that a little too abbreviated? When you get to initials like that, it could be a little confusing, for someone from Idaho with a regional campus using the same moniker or something.
3. I've still seen alot of branding for UWM calling them UWMilwakee, such as their huge ad at Miller Park. Are we sure that UWM is the best we can get? I just fear this branding push leading to nothing but IU's, UofI's, ISU (which there are MANY), etc. Thanks, Craig R. Nielsen 19:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your input, Craig. I'd be happy to share my thoughts on this:

1. I've seen NCAA record books list school's by both their old names and their current names when referring to them prior to their name changes. I believe that the standard used is that if the actual university name was changed (i.e. Texas Western to UTEP, or SWMS to Missouri State), then the old name is used with a mention somewhere of the change to the team's present name. If the university name did NOT change, but merely altered its athletics name (i.e. to Charlotte, Chattanooga, Milwaukee) then the NCAA simply alters past references to reflect this, without any mention of the old name. This is likely due to it being unnecessary to list the old name, as the new one is clearly identified with the old one (being as it was part of it), and the university name did not actually change.
2. The acronyms in this case should not be troubling, as there is no other UIC, just as there is no other UAB. And you'd be hard pressed to argue that the University of Alabama-Birmingham is a more "national" university than is the University of Illinois-Chicago, especially when including other topics outside of athletics. These schools have every right to make their unique NCAA acronyms their primary athletics designation. This includes Milwaukee's acronym, UWM, but they happen to also prefer and now primarily use Milwaukee, whereas UIC and UAB prefer only their acronyms for all athletics references. I also agree with what a few other user's have mentioned: that sometimes the media fails to properly list these schools, some more regularly than others. That should have no bearing at all in this discussion, however, as it would make it practically impossible to decide which school's get listed by their chosen athletics name, and which do not.
3. The ad you refer to in the outfield of Miller Park is an ad for the university itself, hence why it directs viewers to the University's website (www.uwm.edu) and not the official athletics site. As you can see on the billboard (and in all other literature from the school) the preferred reference of the school is UW-Milwaukee, just like the University of North Carolina-Charlotte still prefers UNC-Charlotte when referencing the school itself. This all seems very consistent to me.

Hope this helps! CollegeSportsGuy 06:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks... sort of...

I appreciate your input about the timing of the UWM marketing change. The only suggestion I have if to use a less patronizing language on my user-page. I do not have a "lack of understanding" of the issue (in fact, I've been on your side on a number of conference pages to make sure institutions' marketing decisions are honored on wikipedia). I completely understand the differende betweeen "renaming" and "rebranding". Could I have made a better analogy? Maybe. But the point was that I am trying to accurately reflect each institution's appropriate name at the time of each specific tournament. That's all. All you needed to tell me was that the rebranding took place in 1999, before the 2004 NIT, and my response would have been, "Great. Thanks for correcting my mistake." I'm not trying to jump down your throat, because you make good and constructive edits on here, but I'm just trying to convey that being overly paternalistic about a simple and minor issue can rub other editors the wrong way. Thanks and no hard feelings. -- Masonpatriot 18:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I second that. You need to chill out. There is a fine line between what a school prefers to be called and what people actually know a school as. You may be completely on one side of the debate, but it is still a debate, so all that was necessary was a simple "this is how we've been doing it, please see my talk page for more discussion" and you would not come across as a jerk. Like masonpatriot said, no hard feelings, but a little courtesy would not hurt when we're all just trying to get the information correct. Jyardley 20:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Happydays.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Happydays.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 17:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Happydays.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Happydays.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 05:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Dodge SRT-4 ACR specs brochure.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dodge SRT-4 ACR specs brochure.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Panthers and categories

I notice you created Category:Milwaukee Panther athletes, but there are no articles on any of the athletes. There is not even an article on the team itself (or any of the teams). Do you plan on writing any of these articles? If not, the category should be deleted. If you do not plan on writing any of the articles very soon, the category should probably be deleted until you do.

Also, a word about categorization. When you add the cat link at the bottom of the article, the words that go after the pipe don't control what the text looks like on the cat page, like normal wikilinks, it controls alphabetization, to make sure it shows up ont eh cat page under teh correct letter heading. For example, if you list Bill Clinton in a cat, after the pipe in the link in his article, it would be, "|Clinton, Bill". This will ensure that it shows up in the Cs and not the Bs.

If you ever want to link to a category, use the following syntax: Category:British stage actors. Notice the colon at the front of the link. If you don't have the colon, Wikipedia will assume that you just added the article to the category. Do this when you're talking about the cat on a talk page, or when you list a cat in a "See also." But you really don't have to list cats in See Alsos, because readers can follow categories directly to them. -Freekee 17:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

US Cellular Arena

Hmm...I don't know, maybe because it was early-to-late. Sorry about that. 1ne 19:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Milwaukee

Thanks CollegeSportsGuy for the support on the Highway debate. Let me know if you think my recent post about the fish is clear and succinct enough. I guess Illwauk had a different experience with the fish, but I don't know many people who would take his stance on this. It's an institution in my opinion. Take it easy man.Milwaukee Nick 07:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

UWM "Athletics" section

Would it be possible for you (someone who obviously care deeply about this topic) to help trim this section back, or put it into a separate article? It seems to get longer and more detailed every month, to an extent that is beginning to overshadow the educational and research aspects of the University itself. I'm not the right guy to do it, to put it mildly. :) --Orange Mike 15:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I've created a "UW-Milwaukee Panthers athletics" article and moved a lot of the detailed athletics stuff there. I hope you will look at it and fix anything that you believe needs fixing.--Orange Mike 14:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits made to Dodge SRT-4

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, CollegeSportsGuy! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \.photobucket\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 21:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

NCAA Tourney Conferences

Thanks for all the work you've been doing adding conference info to the NCAA tourney pages. I've always thought they looked a bit overly-programmatic, so every little bit helps. --dantheox 20:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Save

http://uwm.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1594740015 http://uwm.facebook.com/profile.php?id=26724971

Regarding edits to Milwaukee Panthers

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, CollegeSportsGuy! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule proboards\d{1,3}\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 16:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

State School Athletic Programs

Each state has its own state university system, but they all do it differently. Wisconsin, Tennesee, Illinois, Arkansas, Texas, California, Wisconsin, etc are all University of (state)-(something). The athletic programs that go by Wisconsin, North Carolina, etc. are the flagship or oldest universities of the state university system. That is why each of those can use the state alone as their athletic name. However, the other schools in the system must use U(something)-(city) to reflect the fact they are associated with the state university system. That is why Milwaukee, Green Bay, etc must use UW before the city. Each may casually refer themselves as the city or nickname on their uniform for the sake of space. However, official settings must reflect the state title. Other states such as New York (no official hub), Michigan (MSU), Pennsylvania (PSU), Ohio (OSU), etc. use the State University of (state) wording. In NY, hence you have Buffalo State or SUNY Buffalo for example. Hope this clarifies a few things for you, and explains why UW must be put in front of Milwaukee. Schools like Marquette, Syracuse, Memphis, etc are private institutions and thus have all the right in the world to simply present their monkier as the team's city or anything else they choose. Wikipedia from all accounts I've seen tries to be universal, and thus UW in front of the moniker explains to someone in California or somewhere that the school is part of the state university system and not public.UWMSports 23:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

And not to rip on you, because I was looking at your contributions and 99% of them are really good stuff, so don't take any of this personally. --UWMSports 23:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Also true in Connecticut as I go to the Torrington campus. --GoHuskies9904 19:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Green Bay Phoenix

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Green Bay Phoenix, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: UW-Green Bay Phoenix. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bob Gottlieb

A tag has been placed on Bob Gottlieb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 19:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

In general, it's not a wise idea to remove the speedy template yourself, at least not if it's your article. I've opted to replace it with a {{notability}} tag instead to give you more time to work on the article. As it looks right now, the subject doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines and the article is completely unreferenced. If you can clean that up with some references and demonstrate notability, I'm sure the article will stay. Gromlakh (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Woodling/Busbey coaches

The following articles Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Homer_E._Woodling were nominated for deletion. You are welcome to share your opinion on if they should be deleted or not. Thank you for your time. --SportsMaster (talk) 16:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello CollegeSportsGuy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Tom Hewitt (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CollegeSportsGuy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CollegeSportsGuy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CollegeSportsGuy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Lauren Boebert

Please do not insert that material again: it's a gross BLP violation. Drmies (talk) 01:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)