User talk:ColinDaly75

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commercial Rowing Club Dublin (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Commercial Rowing Club Dublin.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ColinDaly75, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comment on Draft:Dublin University Ladies Boat Club

This is not your formal review, but just at a quick glance you really must fix the phrasing. "We"/"our" etc are completely inappropriate on an encyclopedia, as are subjective terms like "beautiful". Bluntly, if you can put an exclamation point on any of your sentences, that sentence is probably wrong.

Your sourcing is a little iffy, you have a few mentions of news articles covering the controversy over this club as a gender/sports issue, which is great, but too much of the sourcing is to hobbyist sites and the like. Can you dig up a little more serious journalist/academic discussion of the club? If you live in Dublin, especially by the university, a library may have a copy of A danger to the men?: a history of women in Trinity College Dublin 1904-2004, which appears to discuss this topic.

So please clean up the language for neutrality/impartiality, and a focus on dry facts vice fluff, and start digging further to see if you can find more serious professional discussion of this group. Good start, keep pressing. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Similar problem with Draft:Commercial Rowing Club Dublin, you really can't go around saying "we". And you definitely need to focus on getting the full who-what-why-when-where into the first few sentences of any given article. See WP:Lead section.

That said, kudos for your work on improving our coverage of Rowing. WP does have a small Wikipedia:WikiProject Rowing, though somewhat inactive currently, but it wouldn't hurt to go to the Discussion page of that project and introduce yourself and your work, just so you might run across some other enthusiasts.

Don't get discouraged, keep up the good work, and check in with the mentors at WP:Teahouse if you get stuck on anything. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DULBC Boathouse.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DULBC Boathouse.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CommercialRC-Logo1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CommercialRC-Logo1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Commercial Rowing Club Dublin was accepted

Commercial Rowing Club Dublin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SmileBlueJay97 talk 22:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Dublin University Ladies Boat Club Crest.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Dublin University Ladies Boat Club Crest.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Dublin University Ladies Boat Club Crest.jpeg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dublin University Ladies Boat Club Crest.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank You for you wonderful information. S Blake 23:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)