User talk:Coldplay3332

Leave me a note !

Iowa explosion

Welcome to Wikipedia! I appreciate your contributions to the USS Iowa turret explosion article. [1] Usually, a name is wikilinked only the first time it appears in the article. Anyway, what do you think of the article? Do you think it focuses too much on certain aspects of the subject and not enough on others? Cla68 (talk) 22:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops; beginners mistake. I think it is balanced give the sources available. I read over the comments page, and do not see much specificity in the criticism.--Coldplay3332 (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the articles. I'll go through them and add additional information as appropriate. Feel free to do so yourself also. If you think information is important, but not important enough to go in the article text, it can be included in the footnote. Since the article texts are copyrighted, I'm going to need to delete them eventually, but thanks again. Cla68 (talk) 22:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

You are being discussed at ANI as a possible sockpuppet/meatpuppet of Cmagha. Thanks. Racepacket (talk) 11:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cmagha for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 4meter4 (talk) 02:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

I spoke with Risker regarding your sockpuppet investigation. After our discussion, it is clear that the accounts mentioned in the case are operated by different people. These accounts will be unblocked. However, please proceed with care in the future. Risker suggested that you and your friends edit in different areas. This is excellent advice, which I strongly suggest you all heed. There is much relevant advice on this page about how to proceed when you share an IP address with another user. Please review that page and follow the instructions listed there - this will help avoid future problems. If you have questions about Wikipedia or editing here, please contact me on my talk page. TN X Man 14:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

The recent warning appears to be unconnected to any vandalism and the warning has been removed. I'm not sure what happened, because the edit the warning linked to does not exist, but there appears to be no justification for a warning. Please accept my apologies for my error regarding your edit. Alansohn (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aleph Samach at Cornell Currently

Is Aleph Samach at Cornell currently meeting and active? I am a Junior Student at Cornell extremely interested in reviving the society for my grade. Please contact me. Is there any-proof of the recent operations?I read a post that your friend was tapped in 86? plese contact me. redoxredox@hotmail.com— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.84.195.68 (talk) 09:01, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hi Coldplay3332! Great work at starting the Elizabeth Smith Miller! Thanks for your contributions about great women! Enjoy some strawberries! SarahStierch (talk) 17:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited John J. Cavanaugh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ted and Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Presidential Policy Directive 19 - Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SL93 (talk) 18:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Presidential Policy Directive 19 - Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 11:53, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Presidential Policy Directive 19 - Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TeeTylerToe (talk) 11:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]