User talk:Colbfi

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Bai Ling. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 08:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What was misleading

What was misleading in my summary?

FileDelinkerBot is not a "vandal". It's a bot that removes links to deleted files, and doing so is not vandalism. - Sumanuil (talk) 02:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Bai Ling, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

The image you inserted has been nominated for deletion for possible copyright infringement. Until a definitive determination has been made that the image is properly licensed, do not re-insert the image.

— Archer1234 (talk) 02:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Colbfi. I am @Archer1234. I encourage you to go to the Bai_Ling_Red.jpg on commons.wikipedia.org to make your case for your claim of ownership of the copyright of the photo. If you did take the photo, would it be fair to say that you have a personal or professional relationship with Bai Ling? I appreciate your civil replies to my good-faith concerns about copyright infringement. Thank you. — Archer1234 (talk) 03:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is fair to say. Actually I am her attorney and friend. As an attorney I take claims of copyright violations very seriously, so when do I get a written apology from you and reinsertion of the photo. What did YOU base your claims upon? Colbfi (talk) 22:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]