User talk:Cohoma23

June 2015

Your addition to List of Girl Meets World episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MPFitz1968 (talk) 13:48, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Your addition to List of Girl Meets World episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Isabelle ♥ 14:49, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Best Friends Whenever, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nickandmore, in any fashion, is not a reliable source.

Hi there, a quick note re: this edit, NickandMore in any fashion is not considered a reliable source. Please see WP:TVFAQ. Information about airdates and such should come from reliable printed sources, like television guides, for instance or Futon Critic. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please don't mark edits such as this one as minor. I've already told you about this once. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuing to mark edits as minor, such as here, here and here. I would advise you to familiarize yourself with the guideline at WP:ME. It states that a "minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." Minor edits are generally edits where a clear spelling fix, grammar fix or formatting adjustment is being applied, or any kind of change where the meaning of the content is not altered. The edits I cited from you do not qualify as minor edits, as they add something of material (production codes for TV episodes) which effectively does change the meaning of the content, plus this is information that other editors may verify for accuracy through the provided references. By checkmarking an edit as minor, you are attempting to tell others that the edit does not need to be reviewed, verified, or determined if it is disputable, and it is misleading to them when found to be otherwise. Personally, I rarely checkmark an edit as minor, even if it is just to correct the spelling of a word, and I usually ignore when an edit is marked as such and review the edit anyway. I suggest you avoid marking any edit as minor. The guideline does indicate that reverts of clear vandalism are minor edits, and those can be marked. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm Philip J Fry. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bunk'd, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philip J Fry (talk) 15:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Disney Channel series, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] Please don't change information without digging up a new reference. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Evermoor Chronicles, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. IMDb is not reliable, see WP:RS/IMDB. nyuszika7h (talk) 17:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Sofia the First episodes. Diff: [2] Adding just any-old reference isn't enough, the references must meet our guidelines for reliable sources. Discussion forums are user-generated and do not meet the standard. I very strongly encourage you to familiarize yourself with our guidelines for reliable sources. You should probably also take a look at WP:TVFAQ. Note that IMDb is not a reliable source for the same reason that discussion forums are not reliable: it is a user-contributed site. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Spider-Man - Ratings

Hi, I saw that you added one of the ratings for S4 of USM. Can you tell me how to measure ratings so I can put the ratings for "Lizards". No one else has done it, and I'm getting tired of waiting of someone to do it. Problem is, I don't know how to measure ratings. Can you please teach me?--68.11.91.158 (talk) 17:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~Hi 68.11.91.158 (talk), It's simple. Go to this website: [3] Archived 2016-06-25 at the Wayback Machine , choose the date of the episode, search the show, and copy the refrence from the last date and change to details. Cohoma23 (talk) 12:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for adding the ratings on for USM! Um, can you please be a bit more specific about how to measure ratings? I saw the graphs and everything, but that still doesn't explain how to convert the numbers into the percentage of U.S viewers in the millions. Can you please provide an example on you do it?-68.11.91.158 (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

68.11.91.158 (talk), So the numbers are in the right column. If it says 520 it means 520k so in milions it will be 0.52 (only 2 numbers after the point), if it says 1,569 you need to write 1.57.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cohoma23 (talk • contribs)

Oh, thank you very much! I understand now. I never done ratings before, and there aren't a lot people going out of their way of these shows, so I really wanted to help. :) Thanks again for adding the ratings for USM.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 18:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya! Can you add the ratings for the "The New Sinister Six - Part 1" on the episodes list? ShowBuzzDaily has it out now Archived 2020-09-19 at the Wayback Machine.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 16:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm sorry to bother you again, but I was wondering if you can add the ratings for the last two episodes of USM? The ratings for "The Sinister Six - Part 2" Archived 2016-08-16 at the Wayback Machine and ratings for "Agent Web" Archived 2016-08-18 at the Wayback Machine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.11.91.158 (talk) 18:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

68.11.91.158, I added it. Cohoma23 (talk) 19:19, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :D--68.11.91.158 (talk) 22:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to always ask you to do this. :( If the admin would only unlock the page, I put the ratings there myself. The ratings for "The Symbiote Saga - Part 1" is out Archived 2016-07-09 at the Wayback Machine.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elena of Avalor ratings (july 2016)

I noticed you changed the ratings I submitted but you should know that your information was wrong. The first two episodes of Elena of Avalor where simulcasted on both Disney Channel and Disney Junior. So the correct ratings would be from both channels combined. The ratings you posted would only make since if the first episode only premiered on Disney Channel and the second episode only premeired Disney Junior. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJJAK47 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it, Cohoma. Your edit was properly sourced and correct. This user simply doesn't understand how things work. I've reinstated the correct ratings. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bnot HaZahav, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You were warned about this extensively in the past. I'll remind you again: please use reliable sources. If you are unsure what those are, ask a user or go to WP:RSN. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your addition to the Steven Universe episode list. While I believe you made a good-faith attempt to try to find a reliable source, something that routes back to Reddit or Steven Universe Wiki isn't reliable by Wikipedia's standards. I second EvergreenFir's sentiments above. Try to do a little reading and investigate! :) - Purplewowies (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cohoma23. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cohoma23. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sabri Maranan episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bridezilla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:10, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cohoma23. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cohoma23. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your article List of Bnot HaZahav Episodes

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page List of Bnot HaZahav Episodes to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Rogermx (talk) 23:05, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]