User talk:Cognoscerapo

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Cognoscerapo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment

Please see here Regards IJA (talk) 00:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Republic of Kosovo". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Guy Macon (talk) 02:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution noticeboard

Hi! Are you planning on participating at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Republic of Kosovo, or would you prefer to be removed from the case? You are not required to participate, but your participation would be welcome. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A warning

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning . Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee remedies that govern edits to these articles. You can read the full decision here. Thank you. bobrayner (talk) 10:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for changing text to deviate from given references; disruptive editing in contentious area (Balkans). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 17:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Despite your earlier block, you continue to exhibit a pattern of battleground mentality and disruptive behavior in the same topic areas. Please take a step back and think about the fact that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a means to further arbitrary real-world conflicts. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]