User talk:Coffeycp

Coffeycp, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Coffeycp! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the new articles on Puerto Rico. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hi I’m just reviewing Juan Pío Pérez. Thank you for creating this article. If it was partially translated from the es.wiki article could you let me know please as there us a template I’d need to add to the talk page. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 18:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mccapra. The article was partially translated from the es.wiki article, my bad. Could you point me in the direction of that template? Thanks.

Coffeycp (talk) 16 June 2020

No worries. I’ve added the template to the article talk page. Any time you part translate from another wiki you need to use the same template on the article talk page. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Iván Enrique Rodríguez | Recommendation

Dear Coffeycp I hope you're well! I'm passing by because I saw you're interests are arts and culture. I am trying to build a compendium of Puerto Rican composers to add in Wikipedia. I started with Draft:Iván Enrique Rodríguez. Could you read it and see if its ready to be accepted? It has been hard to Put this together becasue the systemic discrimination has made difficult for non-white composers to comply with the WP:Composers standards but that doesn't mean that the composers themselves have achieved international notoriety. Ireally hope to hear back from you! Thanks--MahlerLover (talk) 21:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MahlerLover: I think it is a very commendable project you are working on. I have never used the WikiProject Articles for Creation resource, so I may not be the best editor to ask. It appears that I cannot review the article officially through the WP Articles for Creation function, as I am not a participant in that WikiProject. I do think that the article looks publishable to me. There are some minor issues with wording that could be polished, but I think notability is definitely established and any challengeable statements are backed up with sources. While I am sure that the WP Articles for Creation process produces more polished articles, if that process does not work for you as an editor then you may want to bypass it in the future. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help. Coffeycp 28 August 2020

Dear Coffeycp Thank you so so much for your ecouragement! I honestly believe that something like this should be done because the classical music world is going though a change and the only way to include people of color in that change is to recognize their notability within with justice! Could you let me know how this process can be bypassed? I have been having trouble with an user that keeps blocking my stuff and after doing some reaserch on him, he seems to have quite an antiquated view and problematic oppinions on race and difference of ideologiez... quite right-leaning to be honest. --MahlerLover (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MahlerLover: I'm really not sure what you can once you have started the WP Articles for Creation process on a draft. You may have to wait for an editor that is part of the project other than the user who is giving you trouble to approve the article. The bypassing that I refer to is simply not engaging in the draft process at play in the WP Articles for Creation in the first place. You can simply create an article directly into the main article space without drafting it. Of course, any article that does not meet Wikipedia's standards will be nominated for deletion, but I believe that yours does. You can visit Wikipedia:Article development or Help:Your first article for more detailed information about publishing an article. You may also want to consult a more experienced editor, as I have no experience with the drafting process. You could try posting in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Puerto Rico talk page or searching for other help resources. Coffeycp 28 August 2020

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Coffeycp: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 18:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Charles Pushetonequa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Charles Pushetonequa. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more citations, evidence of notability, and categories. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:20, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OsirisDelgado.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OsirisDelgado.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Charles Pushetonequa

Hello, Coffeycp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles Pushetonequa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teodoro Vidal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teodoro Vidal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teodoro Vidal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Duke of New Gwynedd (talk | contrib.) 13:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]