Jump to content

User talk:Codingmaster09876543210

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Codingmaster09876543210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Greater Bangladesh does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  HaeB (talk) 15:54, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: See also Wikipedia:Verifiability - articles should be based on reliable, published sources. If you have concerns that a cited source does not support the statement in the article, or that the cited source does not satisfy Wikipedia's reliability standards, that might be a valid reason to remove the statement. But an editor personally disagreeing with what the source says isn't. Regards, HaeB (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No credible empirical evidence is there to supprt thia claim Codingmaster09876543210 (talk) 16:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello! I'm Tenebre.Rosso.Sangue995320. Your recent edit(s) to the page Greater Bangladesh appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! (talk) 16:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which never happend how can evidence should be sahred to validate ?Rather who claims thia infoe to be true shoyod peovide credible empiri source Codingmaster09876543210 (talk) 16:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What it looks like Tenebre did was revert your edit because you removed information that had a proper source. Take a look at his edit at this diff and consider the referenced article. We work on reliable sources and if you believe this source is problematic, please share but also understand that your personal knowledge does not matter. TiggerJay(talk) 07:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]