User talk:Codename Mike

April 2020

Hello, I'm DarkHorse234. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cigar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DarkHorse234 (talk) 12:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sport in Europe, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. TheImaCow (talk) 12:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at October 28, you may be blocked from editing. Kleuske (talk) 12:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at October 28. Kleuske (talk) 12:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sport in Europe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TheImaCow (talk) 12:58, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hut 8.5 13:15, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Codename Mike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Oh yeah? This what you call vandalism eh Hut 5.8?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 13:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Codename Mike (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Ahmetlii. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User talk:Codename Mike—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Ahmetlii (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]