User talk:Cobretti1

Welcome!

Hi Cobretti1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 13:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your undoing of edit on Barbara Bach

Your edit summary says, "Several other wikipedia pages use birth index entries as a source for date of birth. The index itself is not even linked." Let me offer some thoughts for your consideration:

1) Just because something is found on other pages of Wikipedia does not mean that it is correct.

2) Whether the index was linked or not, the citation ("... On the 1946 birth index for the city of New York, available on the genealogy website Ancestry.) makes it clear that the birth index is the source of the information.

I am not going to revert your change because I prefer not to get into an edit war. I try to follow Wikipedia guidelines as closely as I can. If you prefer not to do so, that is your choice. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Capshaw's date of birth.

I have again reverted the addition of a birth date based on a public record (which goes against WP:BLPPRIMARY). In regard to your comment, "Several other articles use the Texas birth index as a source for the birthdays of other celebs." I don't doubt that they do. However, other articles' use of a source does not validate that use. I often see articles that use IMDb, Find A Grave, tv.com, filmreference.com, NNDB, and other unacceptable sources. That does not make use of such sources valid any more than finding a misspelled word in several other articles would justify use of the misspelling in another article. Eddie Blick (talk) 23:53, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Myers edit

Your reversion of my edit to Kim Myers said, "No good reason to remove perfectly fine sources."

According to WP:BLPPRIMARY, California Birth Index is not an appropriate source for use in a biography of a living person. As I noted in my edit summary, it specifies, "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, ..."

California Birth Index is a public document, and it should not be used to support a living person's date of birth.Eddie Blick (talk) 01:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You really should stop adding birth dates based on the birth index as you did here.[1][2]. See also WP:DOB. Continuing to edit war or logging out to make edits and evade scrutiny will get your account blocked. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. You have been warned about edit warring over the use of inappropriate sources. Logging out of your account to continue doing so is unacceptable. If you do so again, you will be blocked. Jack Frost (talk) 03:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You had been warned about WP:BLPPRIMARY in detail before, further up on this page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]