User talk:Cmhu

Chang Yi Wang

Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view and not promote the subject. Please do not remove the tags again without first addressing the issues. wctaiwan (talk) 00:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm Barkeep49. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chang Yi Wang, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Chang Yi Wang. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=All I want is to keep Chang Yi Wang post have fair chance to improve citation work, it accumulated years of work, would you please give us time and chance to do that?}}

. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cmhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I want is to keep Chang Yi Wang post have fair chance to improve citation work, it accumulated years of work, would you please give us time and chance to do that?

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block. Your use of "we" also indicates that this is a shared account, something that is not permitted, and on top of that you should address your connection to the subject in light of WP:COI and WP:PAID. Huon (talk) 10:12, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cmhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a sharing account! "We" means I need time to get other persons' help to get reference data since it was my weekend mid-night. I'm willing to follow your suggestion and guideline, but I'm a wiki beginner who need to ask for your help and understanding.

Decline reason:

This doesn't address your violations of WP:EW at all. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cmhu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to undo a tremendous deletion which was years accumulated work, which has been edited by everyone around the world for years. Scientific publication should be considered reliable source but all gone. How about give me or someone else chance to improve them?

Decline reason:

This does not address the edit warring. As such, I am declining your request; further appeals can be made using WP:UTRS, but you will lose access to that too if you do not address the reason for the block. If English is not your primary language, you may feel more comfortable editing the version of Wikipedia in your native language, which this block will not prevent. 331dot (talk) 13:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you refuse to address your violations of WP:EW, I have revoked your talk page access for the duration of the block. Please take this opportunity to read and understand our policies, so you can avoid a substantially longer block next time. --Yamla (talk) 13:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Sorry, I don't respond to email. You are welcome to post your question here once your block expires. Note that you indicated that perhaps the English wikipedia isn't the right place for you. You might be happier contributing to Wikipedia in your own language. We require that you understand our policies and directions here, and that means we require that you understand English sufficiently. This isn't meant as a personal attack. I don't understand other languages enough to contribute to any other language version of the Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 13:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of edit request 07-NOV-2019

Hello! I have reverted your edits made at Talk:Chang Yi Wang because they did not follow the guidelines at WP:REDACTED. Those guidelines state that posts written by yourself should not be altered once an editor has posted after you. The correct way to make changes to your older posts would be to indicate removed text through the use of ~~strikeout font~~, while added information should use underlined font. If you have clarifications of an older edit request to be made, please either post them in a new edit request, or use the guidelines for making redactions that I've just described. Thank you for your help, it's much appreciated! Regards, Spintendo 08:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]