User talk:Cloveoil

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Bill Struth, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Archibald 9 9 17:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MOOOOAAARRRZZZZZZZZZ INNTTTEEERRRRNNNNEEEEETTTTTTTTTTZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Oh, and what the hell was wrong with the Paul Hartley pic? --Cloveoil 23:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have indeed been busy, have you got any proof you took the picture/any more relevant pictures e.g. of him playing football?

Archibald 9 9

21:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What manner of proof is required? Do you have any reason to believe that I didn't? --Cloveoil 02:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for that well reasoned and thought out explanation there Archie, that was very kind of you indeed. I take it if you have nothing further to add, you will have no objections to me reverting your removal of the work in question then? --Cloveoil 05:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do have reason to believe you didn't take it, what with it being a widely available picture featured recently in the media, but seeing as I can't prove that as such it might as well go back in.

Archibald 9 9

16:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? You don't happen to recall which particular media outlets have been using this work? I'd be very interested indeed in finding out who has been using this work. --Cloveoil 16:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm amazed you think autism frequency is "well-written". Jane Austen would have deprecated it, as would Ernest Hemingway. Midgley 23:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. However, until they sign up for accounts, I fear that I shall always have the upper hand over them in AfD debates. Cloveoil 23:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If he continues after he's unblocked, he'll will be blocked for a year Ptpgta 21:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude

Is there any reason for removing my, and others, comments and votes here : [1] ? Cloveoil 16:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As VegaDark noticed, it was accidental, due to an edit conflict. AFAIK it's been fixed. My apologies if this caused you any undo concern. Hope you're having a great day : ) - jc37 09:35, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LULZ Not at all old bean, I just thought that I had perchance stumbled upon some part of the wiki empire to which entrance was forbidden. Many thanks for your kind words, I hope that you too are finding yourself in a comfortable state of affairs. Cloveoil 16:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lenzie

Hi Cloveoil,

I reverted your change to lenzie community web site. Lenzie Community Site Sorry - I didn't realise the web hoster's change of server, to upgrade features would take it offline for 24hours! I'd had waited till today to list it ... unfortunately, you hit it at the wrong time.

I've been looking for experienced contributors to Wikipedia with an interest in Lenzie - so if you are connected with Lenzie in any way I would welcome your comments/help.

Mike Haseler

User page

Dear Editor, since your userpage might be regarded as offensive by (many) editors, I was bald and removed all the images of Hitler. Please consider using different images for your user page. Best regards, --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 11:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey I just want to thank you for the support you've given in opposition to Sandstein's actions, as well as the trolling by MarkThomas on my user page. Billy Ego 02:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I only wish I could be more supportive. I've seen loads of people with, what I hope you will accept are, minority viewpoints on wikipedia being railroaded out of the site. It creates an unhealthy imbalance in the editorial quality of the work. It's unfortunate (and somewhat ironic given the perceived nature of your own beliefs) that people feel it necessary to attempt to 'censor' views which are not in accordance with their own, but it does go on, and to a larger extent than is acknowledged on-site. Personally, I believe in a theocratic system, under the rule of God, but I recognise that other people have other views, and are as entitled to have them expressed, as views which are in keeping with proscribed mainstream acceptance are. Unfortunately, I am unable to make comment in the Request for Arbitration, but I will be keeping an eye on proceedings. If I can help in any other way henceforth, please do feel free to leave a note. Good luck d00d. Cloveoil 05:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So I herd...

..that u liek mudkips.

NEVARZ!!!! U AREZ A STINKING LIARZ AND I SEEZ U! Cloveoil 21:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

so u dun liek the kips of mud??? lol 50 Hitler post. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Suigintou (talk • contribs) 14:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Your user page

Hello. I've removed the multiple pictures of Hitler from your user page. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox and please also consider how offensive these will be to most editors. Pascal.Tesson 15:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please also consider that wikipedia is not censored. Cloveoil 21:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does not come into context of the Wikipedia is not censored. I have also removed them. Dreamy ^\*/_!$! 20:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, please don't use edit summaries like "huns vanadalising it". It could be considered offensive to some people. I would just use "rvv" if reverting an obvious vandal. Thanks Thunderwing 20:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My username

Y'what? WATP ^(talk) • _(contribs) 21:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please continue the discussion on the original page. Cloveoil 21:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Might be interested

I noticed that you took part in State terrorism by United States of America discussion for deletion. After the article has survived many deletions, you may be interested that there is a user right now who is deleting large portions of the article. 69.150.209.15 17:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]