Jump to content

User talk:Cloudmessenger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Patricia,

I would not be able to have a detailed conversation about my experiences at Hindi Wikipedia until later this week or possibly early next week. I am busy until then sorry. Will that be too late to discuss or should it be acceptable? GizzaTalk © 01:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia, you may contact me at my gmail address debashish --Debashish (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Cloudmessenger. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Patricia Sauthoff, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Patricia Sauthoff

[edit]

Hello Cloudmessenger, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Patricia Sauthoff, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Sauthoff.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Melmann}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Melmann 20:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being polite and not threatening me with being blocked like the other message I received from an editor prepared to block me for creating a page. Cloudmessenger (talk) 02:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop turning a Wikipedia article into a resume. Drmies (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Melmann’s message. It’s polite whereas yours is overtly hostile for no reason. Melmann gives more information than you and presents it without a threat.
People like you are why so many of us don’t edit here more. This is not YOUR website. It is a community website. Please don’t speak to people as if you own it. Cloudmessenger (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]