User talk:Cloretti2

RE Goldman Sachs

- Thanks for the comments re. Brazil on the Major Powers page. My thinking was that Brazil, at present, is a country of economic potential. Its economic potential, probably the primary concern of Goldman Sachs, is undoubted; however there is more to Major Power status than economic potential. Diplomatically and militarily Brazil is far behind all the other accepted Major Powers. Does Brazil really bear comparison with countries which have permament seats on the UN sceurity council, membership of the G8 etc? My feeling is that the concept of Major Power cannot include Brazil on economic grounds alone. Should Brazil aquire more military clout, or succeed in its objective of getting a permanent security council seat then it may well qualify (All IMHO of course). - - I'd be interested in any thoughts you have, I had looked on the Superpower page but didn't come across a great deal of discussion on Brazil. - - Xdamr 11:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Global city

- - I'm not restoring the table; I've restored the list which was previously compiled and discussed. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 02:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC) - - :Please be more discriminatory and collaborative in your edits, and consult the talk pages concerning this article. This topic has been contentious. I am clearly distinguishing between the list of Other global cities and the Table of the cities of the world. I've restored the former, not the latter. Though both table and list were included as a concession to better balance the article, the joy of the list (which took awhile to compile) is that it points to many authoritative data files that Wikipedians do not and need not have to update. Moreover, this was discussed some time ago. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 02:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC) - - ::Thanks! E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 02:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC) - - :::Great, and not a problem! Like I said, the topic has been contentious and the article can still stand for improvement. Don't be surprised, though, if another Wikipedian in particular decides to revert the table removal ... I won't. Thanks again! :) E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 02:30, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MST

Cloretti,

Até onde eu saiba, o MST é um pouco mais do bando de vândalos descrito naquele parágrafo. O MST até onde eu saiba não é um movimento criminoso e nem é poderoso o suficiente para merecer um destaque especial em "major issues" da seção de economia.

Um incidente ocorrido na Aracruz celuloso, por favor, não é uma "major issue" da economia nacional! José San Martin 03:11, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are communists, aren't they? :) José San Martin 03:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cloretti, já que não vamos chegar a nenhum acordo, mesmo, só pensa nessa sugestão. Já que você cita o incidente da Aracruz celulose, não seria melhor colocar o parágrafo em current events? Não é nenhuma discussão política isso, é apenas formatação, mesmo. José San Martin 03:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I agree. But don't you really think that "vandal" is a little POV? José San Martin 03:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I didn't know that MST was a governmental agency... Everyone is robbed in every country in the world there are criminal organizations everywhere. It is the same violation of private proprety. Why Brazil (or MST is special) ? Wow, best regards and good night. José San Martin 03:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC) (uhm, should I tell him that there's a battle Sorbonne today?)[reply]

Novo Wikiproject

Hi, I created a new Wiki project that you may be interested in. It is long overdue. It is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Brazil. Please feel free to participate!--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 20:33, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Economy of Brazil vs. section Brazil#Economy

Dear Cloretti,

After that incident about MST, I wouldn't dare change the section Brazil#Economy without talking to you first...

But I'm here to talk about something else. The article on Brazil still has to be improved. Few sections have to be enlargened, but others have to be shortened and have its content transfered to the sub-articles. I think that is the case with the section on Economy, that is pretty big, whereas the article on Economy of Brazil is still a little poor.

So, I'll ask you to help me to move some information from the section to the sub-article, while improving both.

Regards,

José San Martin 01:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and questions with India and China

Sorry for slow reply. I think I have made it clear nauseatingly often that the underlying problem with this whole nest of articles is that the criteria they are based on are made up. That's OR straight away. Then you have the layer upon layer of OR that constitutes the individual articles. Fancy an AfD? I'm afraid that may be the only way forward. --Guinnog 11:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Wowsuper7lg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wowsuper7lg.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Saojosedoscampos brasao.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 09:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bewstone.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bewstone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Log-cbd.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Log-cbd.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Aesj11.GIF

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Aesj11.GIF. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 12:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wowsuper7lg.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wowsuper7lg.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 14:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Log-ggb.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Log-ggb.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tenisclubesjc.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Tenisclubesjc.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Supstre2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Supstre2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CBDBrands.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CBDBrands.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CTA2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CTA2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Image-Sabesp.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Sabesp.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kellytranslg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kellytranslg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mantaswim1lg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mantaswim1lg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Microwo2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Microwo2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Microwom.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Microwom.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Inpe1.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Inpe1.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Joseense 0001 120.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Joseense 0001 120.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tenis Clube São José for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tenis Clube São José is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tenis Clube São José until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 09:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]