User talk:Clogscope

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Miss Susie has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Miss Susie was changed by Clogscope (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864036 on 2014-01-10T12:45:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fictionary may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[http://groups.google.com/group/Dixonary Dixonary Google Group]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Miss Susie has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Miss Susie was changed by Clogscope (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857872 on 2014-01-12T16:15:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clogscope, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Clogscope! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stinkety Pinkety

The article Stinkety Pinkety has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stinkety Pinkety for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stinkety Pinkety is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stinkety Pinkety until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]