User talk:Clockworkgirl21

Benjamine the thylacine

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Benjamine the thylacine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CJ 14:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grand Duchess Tatiana Nikolaevna of Russia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Grand Duchess Tatiana Nikolaevna of Russia was changed by Clockworkgirl21 (c) (t) deleting 13338 characters on 2007-12-04T17:29:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 17:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Grand Duchess Olga Nikolaevna of Russia, you will be blocked from editing. Bookworm857158367 18:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

You tried to create a page Clockworkgirl21. You are not suppoed to create pages about yourself; If you want to write about yourself please do so at User:Clockworkgirl21. Thank you. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Clockworkgirl21, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Julian/Gregorian style conversion

Please stop the disruption on the Romanov princesses. We report the actual date of their birth, not when will be their birthday according to Julian calendar in the since 29 February 1900. The next time I will block you Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

I have to temporary block you because I believe you are responsible for the creation of the abusive sockpuppet User:Countmein1990. The duration of the block is 72h. Please do not violate WP:SOCK after your block is expired Alex Bakharev (talk) 02:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets User:Countmein1990 and User:LonnaofOhio

When your block expires, I hope you will avoid creating more sockpuppets like the two you did to continue reverting the birthdates on the Romanov princess articles. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They weren't my sockpuppet accounts. My friends in the history club at school were correcting the birthdates, too. And the Romanovs girls weren't "grand princesses." They were called "grand duchesses" to show they were even grander than princesses. I will add their true birthdates to the body of the article, which the admin has already told me I can do, so that people coming on will know their real birthdates.

The correct translation of their Russian title was "Grand Princess" not "Grand Duchess," as it says in the article. I don't think the birth dates are a necessary addition and have reverted them. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 14:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was grand duchess. And the admin has already told me I can add the bithdates, so I'm adding them again. At least let people who may read it get their REAL birthdates.

The admin doesn't determine content of these pages. And the correct translation of the title is most definitely "grand princess," not "grand duchess." I have found multiple sources to that effect. "Grand duchess" is the most common English translation and has been in use for centuries, so that is what is used here as the titles of the articles. The dates of birth as they were at the time the grand duchesses were actually born is most appropriate for that article. Your additions really are not necessary. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]