User talk:Clemont Jones

Clemont Jones, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Clemont Jones! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wayside School Gets A Little Stranger has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wayside School Gets A Little Stranger was changed by Clemont Jones (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865928 on 2016-06-12T13:18:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please use sandbox for testing instead of making fake edits and then reverting them. Your edits can be mistaken for vandalism and disruptive and it could cause you to be blocked or banned in the future. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 01:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clemont Jones (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I think you may have blocked me in error but I am indeed not a sock puppet. I had created this account four days ago to make useful contributions to articles, but not to evade a block. I am still a busy student at a school and, over the past four days, I have been using this account at home and at my school, two places in which I have active 90-day blocks, which may have caused you to mistake me as a sock puppet user. I didn't use my account in both locations for the sake of evading a block; it was just that, these days, I spend most of my time either at home or at school or taking a bus ride between them. Clemont Jones (talk) 23:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nope, the block was definitely not made in error. —DoRD (talk) 00:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.