User talk:ClaudiaIsabel2000

This is ClaudiaIsabel2000's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi ClaudiaIsabel2000! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trophy Games (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trophy Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ClaudiaIsabel2000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello ClaudiaIsabel2000. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Trophy Games, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ClaudiaIsabel2000. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ClaudiaIsabel2000|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Admin - I'm not being directly or indirectly compensated for creating and editing that article. ClaudiaIsabel2000 (talk) 08:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So how would you describe your relationship with this subject (in your own words)? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"So how would you describe your relationship with this subject (in your own words)?"

Positive, but not being compensated nor paid for creating that article by the subject nor any employee of the subject. I am also not a shareholder nor do I hold any (financial) interest in the business. ClaudiaIsabel2000 (talk) 08:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what a "positive" relationship (with a business) means.

Let me ask this in a different way: you registered your user account, and as your very first edit created a draft on this business. There's presumably a reason why you chose this as your first, and so far only, subject to write about. What is that reason? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also how is that article being rejected, but articles that blatantly advertise a company like Paradox Interactive and Jagex are being approved? The sources used in both articles contain financial statements and announcements made by the respective subjects of the article? ClaudiaIsabel2000 (talk) 08:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't rejected your draft (not yet 'article'), only declined it. Rejection means the end of the road, whereas decline means you can resubmit the draft for another review, once you've addressed the decline reason. That reason being, there is insufficient evidence that the subject is a notable business under our WP:NCORP notability guideline.

Whatever other article may exist out there among the nearly 7m in the English-language Wikipedia is irrelevant (the so-called WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument), as we don't assess drafts by comparison with existing articles, but rather by reference to the applicable standards and policies which all new articles must meet. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My first draft has every reference including news articles written by third-party/independent journalists about the subject. In comparison, Paradox Interactive has not even a single reference to back up the entire overview paragraph. It's clear I was being picked on because you were in a bad mood or had a bad day or something. Nah I wouldn't even bother editing on this site, don't have the time to argue semantics with some bully internet Admin, you won. Hope you feel good. Congrats. Have a nice day ClaudiaIsabel2000 (talk) 08:51, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]