User talk:Clarince63

This is Clarince63's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives

MOTDs (This space for rent)

You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 14:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Levenson

Hi, Clarince63:

I am experimenting with Wiki edits, but my intent was not vandalism; we're talking about Wikipedia in class this morning. I'm one of Tom's students, which is why we chose him as a test subject. The second edit I made (changing 2009 to 2012) is correct, as corroborated at http://sciwrite.mit.edu/faculty. I'm going to look at changing the page again now, but will update the reference with a current accessed date.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.189.77.90 (talk) 14:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Test editing is all very well and good, but please keep them at the Wikipedia:Sandbox. Don't experiment with edits on normal pages, please. If you are sure that the information is correct, then feel free to change it. But make sure it has a reliable source. --Clarince63 (talk) 14:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning Message on My talk page- aplogy requested

hi! you reverted my edit claiming i had not provided an edit summary, and left the following message on my talk page = "

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Rachel's Tomb with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 23:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When I reverted your edit, you deleted the above content from my talk page. I would like an apology and explanation for the misleading comment in the edit summary and for the irrelevant notice. .93.96.148.42 (talk) 23:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanation. In light of the comment above- which sounds factually correct to me - I think you should manually check all of your recent edits. Michael93.96.148.42 (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting you Join Discussion

Hello, I am humbly requesting you point your input on the population discussion going on at the Canadian Sikhism talk page. Thank you. --Schmeater (talk) 00:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, Clarince63, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day! Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 04:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Logan! :) --Clarince63 (talk) 10:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday (2012)

Wishing Clarince63 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 23:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it, Thanks!--Clarince63 (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism? really?

I really can't understand how this edit (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_recurring_Futurama_characters?diff=490174900) amounts to vandalism. The information I added is relevant to the character under which it was added and, most importantly, it is correct information. Please explain what exactly I did wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.234.185.201 (talk) 21:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was my mistake. Looking at the contents of your edit, I thought it was vandalism. You put the content back on the page and it is still there, so no more action needs to be taken. I removed my warning from your talk page. Contact the editor that warned you before me for a similar edit and ask him to remove his warning if you feel it was placed there without cause. I am a human and make mistakes sometimes, and I apologize. Cheers, --Clarince63 (talk) 22:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2600 Fall 2011.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2600 Fall 2011.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

No hard feelings Clarince63 I will leave you alone now.

Sincerely, Opossum Minister — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.93.6.11 (talk) 19:29, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal Level

Are you sure its at 10, for me its only at 6 reverts per minute. Dan653 (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was sure when I posted the update. The RPM counter on Huggle changes quickly. I waited about 60 seconds for the counter to return to normal after logging in (which is customary) and I estimated what the average was at the time. It was about 10 at the time. But I'm not denying what you saw, it probably was 6 reverts per minute. It changes quickly due to lag between your computer and the server that is dolling out the edits to display on Huggle. Or simply for that time being there aren't many reverts. Cheers, --Clarince63 (talk) 22:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks for defending my Talk Page! Greenmaven (talk) 22:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive?

My edit to the list of mlb single season record is constructive. The information on wins is wrong. Charlie Radbourn had 60 wins in 1884. But the record wrongfully belongs to Jack Chesbro. I was trying to put the actual record holder on the page. The proof I have is from the National Baseball Hall of Fame.

error message?

Greetings Clarince63

I've randomly gotten this message:

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pulpit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Clarince63 (talk) 21:19, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't remember having ever made any contributions to Pulpit (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Pulpit)

Could you please tell me what I have written and why it has been removed, or if this is an error...

Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nallados101 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014

Today's motto...

→ What's dangerous about this is we don't know its potential.

Nominate one today!

Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Clarince63 (1).png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

creation–evolution controversy

An article you have edited List of participants in the creation–evolution controversy has been nominated for deletion. See https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_participants_in_the_creation%E2%80%93evolution_controversy FYI --Kaptinavenger (talk) 08:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Clarince63. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Clarince63. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Clarince63. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Clarince63. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]