User talk:Claire.c.n

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Edo Segal. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for making me aware of the edit warring policy. Is there any compliant way we can get the page taken down? The information that has been approved and is up on the "Edo Segal" page now is unimportant/irrelevant, and the mention of the Golani Brigade could potentially be damaging given recent news. Are there any Wikipedia deletion criteria that fit with this reasoning? Thank you!

Claire.c.n (talk) 18:44, 5 October 2017 (UTC)