User talk:Clairchallenorchadwick
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Causeukpublicrelations", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".
Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Clients?
[edit]Are you writing about/on behalf of your clients? Secretlondon (talk) 14:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have found evidence of a client relationship. Undisclosed paid editing is a serious violation of Wikipedia policy. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- I was asking the user! Could you tell me your evidence, then? Secretlondon (talk) 15:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- This is not paid editing, please refer to citations. Causeukpublicrelations (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- No this is not paid editing, please refer to citations. Causeukpublicrelations (talk) 16:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- No Cause UK generates and owns original creative. Please see the external citations. Causeukpublicrelations (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- No. Please refer to citations. Causeukpublicrelations (talk) 16:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- So are you claiming that you are not compensated by your clients for any of your work with them, even outside of Wikipedia? Because if they pay you for your regular PR work, then I will point out this part of Wikipedia paid editing disclosure policy:
Users who are compensated for any publicity efforts related to the subject of their Wikipedia contributions are deemed to be paid editors, regardless of whether they were compensated specifically to edit Wikipedia.
- All that aside, your account will be blocked for a violation of the username policy, unless you have submitted a change of username request. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- We did this creative ourselves, we didn't have a client, we created the project from scratch and paid for it ourselves. We also do a lot of pro bono work for charities and creatives, it is our intellectual property and idea from inception to delivery.
- Separately we do have paid clients but they are not referenced here. Causeukpublicrelations (talk) 16:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have submitted a change of username request Causeukpublicrelations (talk) 16:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- You still cannot edit promotionally. Secretlondon (talk) 13:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi my edits are factual based with citations. Please view citations. Clairchallenorchadwick (talk) 08:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- You still cannot edit promotionally. Secretlondon (talk) 13:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- All that aside, your account will be blocked for a violation of the username policy, unless you have submitted a change of username request. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC)