User talk:Cke77

Hello. OK, let's be honest. Your article about that school is amongst the most stupid ones. It's pure vanity: you fail miserably at proving there is anything worth of interest in this school. You give petty details like the number of student per grade. How about the number of rest rooms, the colour of the paint on the walls. You are so full of yourself, that you imagine you can create categories just because you fancy it. How about creating articles for all coins you ever possessed, and create a category "the coin I possessed" ? Hugh ? My best suggestion is : do not create any article for the next 2 months, take time to do minors edits here and there. Go into your school library, open an encyclopaedia, read the entry at encyclopaedia and understand what is happening here. Read the welcome page. Grow up. Abandon pointless vanity. Do not suppose it's clever to create schools articles because plenty of them clutter up WP. I expect a response by you on this page. Gtabary 12:19, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gtabary — please refer to WP:CIVIL before you rant at other editors. Thanks. ⇒ BRossow ^T/_C 03:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Whswall.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Whswall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BRossow 03:14, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Area codes

Hi there. Please stop creating extremely short area code articles as these are likely to be deleted. If you're planning to expand them, it would be better to build each into a full article, but at least into a stub, before creating the next. Thanks. —Wh o uk (talk) 11:58, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leobsod.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Leobsod.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:FTC at NYAS09.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:FTC at NYAS09.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Artifact.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Artifact.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 03:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:H22card.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:H22card.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xboxcont.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xboxcont.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Vieque (talk • ctb) 00:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Whswall.JPG

The file File:Whswall.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]