User talk:Cityinfonorns

Winter Olympics

Hi, Cityinfonorns, since you didn't leave any edit summaries as to why you changed the Sochi locator map on the Olympics page, I reverted it. I raised the topic for discussion on the talk page there to get consensus. Could you also point out why the other map of participating countries is incorrect and maybe update it instead of deleting the whole thing? Strafpeloton2 (talk) 03:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the map of Participating National Olympic Committees is incorrect if you Could update it please do--Cityinfonorns (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it incorrect? Is a country missing? Too many included? I think it is more beneficial to bring this to the talk page so someone can change whatever is wrong with it than deleting it. Strafpeloton2 (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

there Too many included if someone Could update it it is more beneficial to the page--Cityinfonorns (talk) 01:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones? Can you be more specific? Strafpeloton2 (talk) 01:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the map of Participating National Olympic Committees--Cityinfonorns (talk) 02:42, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What specifically is incorrect about the map of Participating National Olympic Committees? Strafpeloton2 (talk) 03:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

there Too many included incorrect Participating Olympic Committees--Cityinfonorns (talk) 04:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which countries? Jirka.h23 (talk) 07:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please note that you have violated the three revert rule at 2014 Winter Olympics. From WP:3RR "an edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert" which means you made many more than 3 reverts on the page within the 24 hour period. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:42, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

As reported here at the 3RR noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cityinfonorns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no Block reason!!!! why!! Cityinfonorns (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. m.o.p 18:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block reason is given as abusing multiple accounts. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: Could you shed some light? Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure. This is one of at least 40 usernames created by this person. Some of them are tagged as sockpuppets of User:Gbgfbgfbgfb, but that was just one of the garbage account names used. See Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gbgfbgfbgfb. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of active Turkish Navy ships listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of active Turkish Navy ships. Since you had some involvement with the List of active Turkish Navy ships redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Antiochus the Great (talk) 16:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]