User talk:Citermon

Welcome, Citermon!

I'm glad you've decided to join us - this is a great project. We do have a lot of users, and are currently working on 6,907,757 articles, so things can be a little intimidating! Don't worry - we love to help out, and we'll try our best to make your stay here as comfortable as possible.
Here are a few links I found helpful when I first arrived here.

Be Bold!
Don't let grumpy users scare you off
Meet other new users
Policies, guidelines, and rules
How to edit a page and write a great article
A handy tutorial, and a picture tutorial
Writing well
Learn from others
Play nicely with others
Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
Tell us about you

You should sign your name on talk pages, discussions and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. Also, if you don't want to jump right into editing articles right now, why not check out the sandbox? Feel free to make test edits there.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian - I definitely do. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or problems, leave me a message on my talk page, and I'll try my best to help. Otherwise, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We hope you stick around, and make sure you enjoy yourself! Cheers, lovelaughterlife♥ (user|talk) 17:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent edit to Raviraj article

I wanted to mention you had made a nice addition at the end of the article. Btw, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Neutral Coverage on the Sri Lankan Crisis project. Elalan 20:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject NCSLC

Hi Citermon, we wanted to invite you to join this project to help cleanup SL related article on wikipedia. NCSLC: Neutral Coverage of the Sri Lankan Crisis. Pls let me know your inputs and how to take it forward from here. We are eagerly looking fwd to having you there. Cheers, Elalan 20:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject NCSLC

Hi Citermon, regarding Chemmanai mass graves, you need to create the article. Believe it or not, I don't know much about the details. RaveenS can perhaps help you with this and lead the way. RaveenS knows much more about all this stuff than I do or ever will know. If you however need my help specifically, I can point you in the direction sometime late this weekend. Please also consider joining the project and meet other editors who also want to clean up these articles and ensure NPOV. Elalan 02:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, thanks for the article. When the events thats being talked about happened, I did remember to ask the same question the author asked. It really smacks of the injustice inherent within humanity particularly directed at certain people. Maybe in the grand scheme of things its a good thing, this further raises the cause of certain people to the moral high ground. Elalan 14:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail account

Enable your e-mail and send me an e-mail. Thanks RaveenS 03:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility warn

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner by using the word Daft against on other users comments . Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigating edit wars. ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 19:27, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during January 8 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, as you did to Padahuthurai bombing, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 21:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: Blank3

Regarding edits made during January 10 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you blank a page, as you did to Padahuthurai bombing, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 00:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Common guys, this is simply a difference of opinion about WP:NPOV not a case of blanking that needs to escalate to this level. Yes Citermon was aggressive in his edits but he did not blank it. He left a fair amount of government response in. Also to term his edicts as blanking by a sockpuppet in the edit summary is provocative and may be considered WP:NPA and WP:ATTACK. Let’s all calm down and think it through. There is enough iinformation to write a good article about the latest case of Sri Lankan government going after the LTTe and ending up killing civilians instead. I don’t think the government began the mission to kill civilains deliberately. But that is my bias.

Hence we can write the article properly per WP:Lead then follow up with the

Short description of the incident

Reactions from the LTTE, Roman Catholic Bishop, Anglican Bishop[1]

Initial Government reaction and Government reaction to accusation including its justification.

I request Citermon to follow this method to edit it positively. All the other needed references are in the article itself. Thanks RaveenS 14:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]