User talk:Cincinnati Rose

May 2020

Hello, I'm ValeJappo. An edit that you recently made to C20H14N4 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ValeJappo (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a test; I thought it sounded better that way. Cincinnati Rose (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to C20H14N4, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Sorry, that's against the Wikipedia convention. Thanoscar21 (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the Wikipedia convention? Cincinnati Rose (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:GWAR, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:Consensus. Maybe @Thanoscar21: has something to add--ValeJappo (talk) 16:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't mean Wikipedia convention that way. I meant it like, if you go to the disambiguation page of Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos, and many others, it follows a specific format:

______ may (also) refer to:

Thanks! Thanoscar21 (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ludo Janssens, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nyook ✉ 18:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manuel Suárez (footballer), you may be blocked from editing. Tobi 406 (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cincinnati Rose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just looked at the contributions page for Skiyomi, and that account isn't even blocked here. So how am I "evading a block on that account"? Cincinnati Rose (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. 331dot (talk) 22:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You know perfectly well that account is globally locked. I have revoked talk page access to prevent any further trolling. --Yamla (talk) 22:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 30440

UTRS #30440 was submitted on 2020-05-28 01:51:23 . This review is now closed. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 03:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]