User talk:Cihsai

Welcome!

Hello, Cihsai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Khoi khoi 20:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Çamlıhemşin

Information on Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, not the "truth" -- see WP:V. Therefore, you cannot remove information if it is based on a reliable source simply because you think it's false. Please read-up on these two policies, thanks. Khoi khoi 20:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. What specific parts of the Hemşince article do you dispute? Perhaps for now you could add {{fact}} tags to the specific sentences that you dispute. I have contacted the author of the article to add sources. Khoi khoi 19:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed an explanation to the discssion page of the Article...Basically Tiltle, Text and Source do not match with each other. I think it's a messCihsai (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wholesale Revert in Hemshin peoples

Hi, I notice you are taking an interest in the Hemshin peoples entry. It looks like user Eupator has engaged in yet another wholesale revert. I have put a warning to Eupator’s page and also informed relevant admin.Omer182 (talk) 20:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages

Don't revert users on their own talk pages, as you just did to Eupator. Users may delete warnings; this confirms that they have seen the warning, which is a good thing. Also, don't make ad hominem comments. Your admonishment to Eupator was rude and provacative. Jehochman ^Talk 13:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Your recent editing history at Hemshin peoples shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —Rutebega (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A user has complained about your edits of Hemshin peoples

Hello Cihsai. Please see User talk:EdJohnston#Editor Cihsai. You may respond there if you wish. It appears that you have been constantly reverting a mention of Armenians from the lead of this article, for example here. If you have a reason for doing this, one would expect you to present it on the article's talk page. There are no posts by you on the talk page since 2008. The background for this issue is the WP:ARBAA2 arbitration case, which I can explain if you are curious. If you don't choose to respond, you'll probably be getting a formal warning under that case. Trying to force your point of view into the article by reverting is unlikely to work in any article that is subject to arbitration. You need to have reasons and you need to persuade the other editors. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read the following notice:

The Arbitration Committee authorises Wikipedia administrators to impose sanctions on editors who edit pages relating to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Blocks, bans on reverting edits, bans from the entire topic area, or other sanctions may be imposed for disruptive edits to pages relating to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts.

Before making any more edits to this topic area, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. The arbitration decision affecting edits to this topic can be read here. I will record on the arbitration case decision page that you have been given this notice. You are now formally aware discretionary sanctions have been authorised and can be imposed with no further warning. Please do not hesitate to contact me or any other editor if you have any questions.

Your claim that consensus was reached to remove mention of Armenians from the lead of Hemshin peoples has no visible support. If you continue to try forcing your POV into the article you may be sanctioned. This warning is being logged in the arbitration case. EdJohnston (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban from Armenia and Azerbaijan

Since you've once again reverted the lead of Hemshin peoples to remove mention of possible Armenian descent, without ever achieving consensus for your views, you are banned indefinitely from all topics covered by WP:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. I'm taking this action under the authority of the discretionary sanctions provided in the arbitration case. This topic ban can be enforced by blocks if necessary, and it's being logged in the case. The ban covers all pages of Wikipedia including articles and talk. You can appeal my decision either to me, to WP:Arbitration enforcement or to the Arbitration committee. Let me know if you have any questions. EdJohnston (talk) 04:34, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]