User talk:Chyu83

Copyright problems with Image:Lowellsflibrary.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Lowellsflibrary.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Oldlowellmasonic.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oldlowellmasonic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 19:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lowell High School

Yeah, I don't like how you shoved the old page to RandomPage222 to get it deleted. "Lowell High School" is meant to be a disambig page. WhisperToMe 23:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ophthalmology WikiProject

If you're interested in collaborating with eye and vision-related articles, check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Ophthalmology. -AED 01:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a medical student, you may also be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine. Cheers! -AED 02:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

300 Edits

Hey, thanks for contributing to the article. I've noticed that your edits have been reverted a few times, and I thought I'd bring you up to speed as to the reasons it keeps getting bounced. In most Wikipedia articles, there is a need to keep the articles a certain size, so they can load on slower computers as well as maintaining a certain size per article. Most of the articles you see when you first go to the Wikipedia site are called featured articles (WP:FA). If you take a look at some of the articles, you will notice that they tend to look a lot alike when it comes to sizxe and general length of sections.

I agree that it wasn't just the Spartan phalanx formation that was used to fight off the Persians. However, military historians pretty much agree with the idea that the phalanx tended to keep a small group of soldiers alive in the face of a larger-sized opponents. It is for these two reasons that your edits have been reversed. It isn't like people are against you or your writing style. We really are happy you are contributing good style, and not useless garbage and vandalism.

If I can do anything to help you out, just let me know. :) -Arcayne 01:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will you check my Amaurosis fugax article

I have been working on expanding the Amaurosis fugax article. It is still extremely inadequate/incomplete, and I will continue to work on it in the coming days; but, I wanted to get feedback on the work I have done. Would you be willing to give me some feedback? This is my first article. Kilbad 20:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:LHSseal2.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LHSseal2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPMED list of open tasks

You listed an article at the Wikipedia Medicine project's list of open tasks some months ago. It's not clear to me whether your concerns have been addressed. Would you please look at the article you listed, and if it has improved, remove it from the list of open tasks? If you still have concerns about the article, please let me know, and I'll see if together we can recruit some assistance with it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UCDSOM

Please clarify why you are adjusting it to 5 percent, or provide sources. Thank you. Pyrofork (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:IOVSCoverfig.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:IOVSCoverfig.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiology task force

Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!)

-- Addbot (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 12:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: National Resident Matching Program

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as National Resident Matching Program, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.nrmp.org/about_nrmp/index.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:National Resident Matching Program and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:National Resident Matching Program with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:National Resident Matching Program.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:National Resident Matching Program saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Hnsampat (talk) 23:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Chyu83! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Ivan R. Schwab - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SantaClaraValleyMedicalCenterLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SantaClaraValleyMedicalCenterLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:46, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]