User talk:ChuchoVCJMuzik

Welcome ChuchoVCJMuzik!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,325,077 registered editors!

Hello ChuchoVCJMuzik. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:39, 23 January 2020 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:39, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Itiola has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Itiola. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 20:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Itiola has been accepted

John Itiola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 02:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you, I'm so happy for do that, God Bless you ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no wp:self published source

Per the discussion at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore. It is a wp:self published source. Since this is a long running dispute, any contributor warned by the situation and who doesn't respect it, would encounter sanctions and could be blocked from editing. Thanks. You've been informed because you used this source here. Woovee (talk) 01:58, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boricua Guerrero: First Combat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Boricua Guerrero: First Combat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.amazon.com/First-Combat-Boricua-Guerrero/dp/B005GWXAAE. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rng0286 (talk) conts (extended confirmed, rollbacker, and pending changes;) Excellent! (rights) D'oh! 05:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eduardo Behrentz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eduardo Behrentz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Assyrtiko (talk) 18:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IPBE

I have given you temporary IPBE. Cheers. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I thank you very much. Happy day for you. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 14:48, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can do you unblock me once again? Please. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChuchoVCJMuzik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block exemption expired on June 25, 2022, but unfortunately I can't do more about the internet service they provide me in my country, Venezuela. I would like to be unlocked again to continue contributing content to this platform as I have been doing in recent months. Thanks. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you'd like permanent IPBE the best way to get it is to go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request it. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 13:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IPBE granted for 1 year. In a years time, if still being affected by the blocks, a longer and possibly indefinite granting of the right can be looked into. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your work. Have a great day. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 21:29, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

Buen provecho!! Garmaar (talk) 21:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks my friend. Con gusto, la disfrutaré. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 02:39, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daniela Mejía moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daniela Mejía, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Musiko

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Musiko, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 02:51, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Alexis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lauren Alexis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 02:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Mason (TV personality) (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brandon Mason (TV personality) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:19, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChuchoVCJMuzik! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:19, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Mario Nawfal

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Mario Nawfal has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello ChuchoVCJMuzik. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mario Nawfal, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ChuchoVCJMuzik. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ChuchoVCJMuzik|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am not receiving money from any source. I just wanted to diversify my articles with new topics, but then I will try to maintain the line of creation that I already had, mostly about Latin American music and artists. Sorry for the inconvenience caused, I will try to be more cautious with my new articles and editions. Thanks. ~~~~ ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 02:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daniela Mejía

Hello, ChuchoVCJMuzik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniela Mejía, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Eduardo Antonio

Hello, ChuchoVCJMuzik,

Thank you for creating Eduardo Antonio.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

remove or rewrite non-English content

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Eagleash (talk) 06:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lauren Alexis

Hello, ChuchoVCJMuzik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lauren Alexis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rafael McGuire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafael McGuire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael McGuire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KH-1 (talk) 05:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daisuke Kamada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daisuke Kamada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shivangi1738 (talk) 07:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paisclo Solutions Corp

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paisclo Solutions Corp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:39, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 14:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aiona Santana

The article Aiona Santana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable singer/model.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bedivere (talk) 14:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aiona Santana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aiona Santana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aiona Santana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Declined PROD - previously deleted by PROD, ineligible again. Consider WP:AFD". @Explicit

Do not act in vandalism, please. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Latin Awards Canada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latin Awards Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latin Awards Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 01:23, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Farandula Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farandula Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farandula Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 05:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clemente Romero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clemente Romero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemente Romero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 05:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic article creation

The articles you have been creating do not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. See your talk page history for more details.

Before you continue to create articles, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies on notability, particularly the general notability guideline and the guideline for biographies and biographies of living persons. If you are unsure whether an article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines, please post a question at WP:TEAHOUSE. In addition please read WP:V, WP:RS, WP:CITE.

Please do not continue to create articles if they do not meet the notability guidelines. BLPs absolutely need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse.

If this problem continues, your editing priviledges may be curtailed or revoked.

Thank you. // Timothy :: talk 12:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm just a Wikipedian who is increasingly diversifying its content, and if you review Bedivere's history, in the past the user has posted many articles to be deleted massively and has been blocked due to editing wars.

All these articles in question had already been reviewed and approved, I don't understand why this user now arrives and templates 8 articles of my creation and I begin to receive so many messages of this nature. Thanks for this message, thanks for monitoring and for contributing so that we have a better Wikipedia. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 16:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you respond @TimothyBlue's advice by making personal attacks? You should instead begin to reconsider the quality of your work Bedivere (talk) 19:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of B Martin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B Martin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B Martin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 14:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eduardo Antonio

The article Eduardo Antonio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable. Does not pass GNG. Sources are PR-stuff. See related AFDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aiona Santana, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farandula Records, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael McGuire, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clemente Romero

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bedivere (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sagcy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sagcy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagcy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Eric for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Eric is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Eric until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Brandon Mason (TV personality)

Hello, ChuchoVCJMuzik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brandon Mason (TV personality), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 03:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yo ya había notificado eso en Wikipedia en español, gracias por traerlo a acotación. Ellos están al tanto. ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 03:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Caf%C3%A9/Portal/Archivo/Ayuda/2022/11#Premio_por_ser_Wikipedista ChuchoVCJMuzik (talk) 04:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eduardo Antonio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eduardo Antonio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Antonio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 04:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Zurdo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Zurdo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Zurdo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 06:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brandon Mason (TV personality)

Hello, ChuchoVCJMuzik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brandon Mason".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leycang El Grandioso for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leycang El Grandioso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leycang El Grandioso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 16:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChuchoVCJMuzik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leycang El Grandioso moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Leycang El Grandioso, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Leycang El Grandioso

Hello, ChuchoVCJMuzik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leycang El Grandioso, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]