User talk:Christopheronthemove

Welcome!

Hi Christopheronthemove! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 04:01, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Drmies Christopheronthemove (talk) 04:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Previous account(s)?

Hello, Christopheronthemove,

For an account that hasn't even been around for a full day, you are jumping into AFD deletion discussions (not an area new editors know about) and offering some very definitive opinions on what should happen with articles being considered for deletion.

What previous accounts did you edit Wikipedia with? And please do not say that you previously edited just as an IP editor as very few IP editors get involved in deletion discussions. Thank you for being forthcoming on your previous editing experience. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey , who is this ? Is anything wrong in editing wikipedia ? I have been trying to edit every possible sections in wikipedia. I am a journalist and we had a detailed seminar few months back on how to edit wikipedia, its different sections etc. Do let me know if editing such sections are exempted for new users like me ? Please clarify Christopheronthemove (talk) 04:48, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Akevsharma (talk) 09:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sharma, what is this all about? discussion on what ? will check it out Christopheronthemove (talk) 19:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent addition in an archive page

I see you reinserted what I have removed. Your recent addition IMHO still doesn't belong there. You should consider going to WP:SPI instead, but then I see you copy-and-paste your same addition in other pages. I don't know what else to tell you other than self-revert what you added in the Archive page. Thanks. George Ho (talk) 04:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey George Ho I am not able to see edit button in the page you suggested. Can you help me move it to correct page ? Christopheronthemove (talk) 04:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should not need to create anything as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Farzanfa007 is not a red link. And sorry I'm reluctant to get involved here given it's very unclear to me what's going on and I'm unwilling to get involved in a possible retaliatory filing by someone who is themselves a sock so I'm not going to help you directly file the case. Sock investigations tend to be complicated so to be blunt if you can't figure out how to properly file a case perhaps it's best if you don't. What is clear is that your posting does not belong in the archive so I have removed it Nil Einne (talk) 07:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BTW you really should read the how to file a case help box at WP:SPI if you have not done so already. Nil Einne (talk) 07:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

draft

Hi, i have movies https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Kudimahaan page to draft as it is not ready .Please dont movie until it complete Monhiroe (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. you are right. I have not completed it. will complete adding missing details and move Christopheronthemove (talk) 17:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on the format. can u get the production details .. Such as first look release refrenceces etc.. Monhiroe (talk) 17:46, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes. It is in google search. Will send here if you need Christopheronthemove (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sure please

send Monhiroe (talk) 17:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Christopheronthemove with out adding the production. Kindly don't move the main space. If u find productions links please share here. Monhiroe (talk) 18:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

done Christopheronthemove (talk) 18:39, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Christopheronthemove as i mentioned without complete don't move the Movie page. You didnt add external links and crew details.Dont involve it again.

CC to:@Liz Monhiroe (talk) 04:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Movie

Dont move movies until it releases and get 2 or more notable reviews. I have moved your article to draft work on there .https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Draft:Live_(2023_film) Monhiroe (talk) 11:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Live (2023 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Live_(2023_film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Monhiroe (talk) 12:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply you a relatively a new user and you are continuously disrupting my editing in wikipedia and following wrong stratergy. The production of the movie Live is already notable. Thats why I moved the page to draft. If you make any further disruption, you will be reported Christopheronthemove (talk) 13:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Live (2023 film). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Christopheronthemove,

Please do not cut and paste content into a second version of an article on the same subject. It confuses the attribution history of the article. If you object to draftification, please move the same, original article from Draft space back to main space rather than doing a cut & paste job. If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Christopheronthemove, Monhiroe has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Monhiroe (talk) 19:00, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ajit Ravi Pegasus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajit Ravi Pegasus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajit Ravi Pegasus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Monhiroe (talk) 00:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tony Michael for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Michael is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Michael until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 04:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vriddhi Vishal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vriddhi Vishal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vriddhi Vishal. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Uncle Spock (talk) 13:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Uncle Spock, G4 can't be applied here as the article is entire new and has nothing to do with any previously deleted article which was deleted back in a year or more. I have added new movies , Tv shows , serials and lot more about the subject in this article from 2022 and 2023 which will be definetly not there in any previous form of the article. Thus its not clearly identical and please remove the tag. Christopheronthemove (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Vriddhi Vishal while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Uncle Spock (talk) 15:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't edit using IP and only contribute to wikipedia using my account. You seem to be a new user who created account this month on 9th and you seem to be well versed with everything in wiki. Do you have previous experience using any other account in wikipedia ? Christopheronthemove (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vriddhi Vishal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vriddhi Vishal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vriddhi Vishal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uncle Spock (talk) 07:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christopheronthemove (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am no way connected to any sockpuppet and I don't really know why I am blocked. I am extreamely sorry if I have done anything wrong that disrupts wikipedia and I won't repeat any disruption in wikipedia and will abide wikipedia policy. I have been contributing to wikipedia constructively and I have been accused of sockpuppetry by an IP and new users throughout after I found out and reported a sock named Akevsharma. After which my edits has been targeted by IP's and new users. So I felt harrased and yesterday I reported it at the admin reporting centre, that's the only thing I did. I have only created pages having enough reliable sources and has not created any articles with promotional tone. I am a new user with only nearly 2 month experience in using wikipedia and the experience here was not at all good. In wikipedia group of account comes and attack a novice or new comer if he create any page, even following entire wikipedia guidelines and no proper help is given by anyone and IP's and original socks play around and people like me who loves wiki and wants to constructively contribute to wikipedia are blocked for no proper reason. I am once again extreamely sorry if I have done anything wrong that disrupts wikipedia and I won't repeat any kind of disruption in wikipedia and will abide wikipedia policy. Kindly unblock me so that I can constructively contribute to wikipedia Christopheronthemove (talk) 18:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am very skeptical that a seminar educated you on participating in AFDs. 331dot (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.