User talk:Christopher Pritchard
Bashley Cricket Club
[edit]Hi. There's been quite a bit of discussion about cricket club notability in WP:CRIC recently, and it's been decided in WT:CRIC that amateur clubs at the highest level of the recreational sport (ie, the ECB Premier Leagues and a few notable other leagues in England and Wales) are notable. Clubs at lower level aren't considered notable, unless there are special circumstances, likely to be historic in most cases. We've put quite a bit of work into clarifying this and reordering the list of clubs in England and Wales to reflect this. Other countries are now debating how to follow suit with their top-level cricket clubs too. Gently, over a number of weeks, several of us are likely to create a lot of what will usually be fairly short articles on these clubs. So as a recent changes patroller you may see others. I'll put this note on the Bashley talk page too. Thanks. Johnlp (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Zack pepsin
[edit]Why are we leaving the Zach pepsin page intact? I deleted the text on there, but you restored it, and put it up for speedy deletion, but someone else put a hold on the speedy deletion. I'm new at Wikipedia editing, though my user ID has been around forever, so could you explain? Thanks. TravelingDude (talk) 21:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
March 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page American Pie (film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Quantumobserver (talk) 22:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I reverted: "The pie part concerning the title is in relation to the pie fucker who fucked the pie." using twinkle, as that is not appropriate for the article, I do not believe I was vandalising Christopher Pritchard (talk) 22:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- yup, Quantumobserver is in error here, but thats fine, its human to err. SpitfireTally-ho! 22:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Whoa. I just took a look at that again, and realized that the vandalism was not, in fact, on the right side of the diff. Sorry about that, you were correct. Quantumobserver (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- yup, Quantumobserver is in error here, but thats fine, its human to err. SpitfireTally-ho! 22:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Alessandro Del Piero. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 21:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think that I was unconstructive, I think we just ended up reverting/editing at the same time. Christopher Pritchard (talk) 21:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- It appeared as vandalism at this edit to the Alessandro Del Piero article as there appears to be no relevance to including Evan MacKinnon, as a best friend or not. I have removed the warning, but I cannot find any connection between the two individuals, nor a reason as to why anyone's best friend should be listed in the lead of the article. Alansohn (talk) 22:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I realised that after I edited it, but by then you'd reverted it, no harm doneChristopher Pritchard (talk) 22:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- It appeared as vandalism at this edit to the Alessandro Del Piero article as there appears to be no relevance to including Evan MacKinnon, as a best friend or not. I have removed the warning, but I cannot find any connection between the two individuals, nor a reason as to why anyone's best friend should be listed in the lead of the article. Alansohn (talk) 22:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)