User talk:Chrisbinx

CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chrisbinx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reason for block not provided. Chrisbinx (talk) 19:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Inaccurate. A reason was indeed provided. Yamla (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I have reviewed both the Wikipedia:Blocking policy and Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks information pages. My user page was not populated until today when I placed my unblock request. I did not receive a block notice from @DoRD: on this page or via email. Of the few edits I have preformed, absolutely none have been disruptive. Chrisbinx (talk) 19:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chrisbinx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reason for block has still not been provided. Please unblock my account. My edits have not been disruptive nor will they ever be. I respect this platform and its policies/guidelines. Chrisbinx (talk) 18:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for abuse of multiple accounts. This is what will need to be addressed in any unblock request. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason for your block is presented to you when you try to edit, but to make it clear, I have placed the same message above. Also see this. —DoRD (talk) 20:23, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chrisbinx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't had multiple accounts simultaneously. This is the second account that I have created, but not for any malicious or abusive reason. I don't remember anything about my first account, I don't think I made any edits with it. I made the other account a few years ago and the information is tied to a work email that I no longer have access to. My intention when creating that first account was to edit information related to the Liberty Village neighbourhood. I worked for the LABIA and wanted to help the community that employed me. After making the account I familiarized myself with the editing guidelines. I remember learning at the time that what I had wanted to do would be Conflict of interest (COI) editing and I did not move forward as planned. I did not abuse that account and I no longer know how to access it. This year I created an account using my personal email so as to be able to get my login details regardless of my workplace. Remembering the policies I came across before, I tried to declare all my possible conflicts of interest on my user page prior to making any edits, in an effort to be as transparent as possible. My edits have been few and have not been disruptive. I am trying to adhere to all Wikipedia policies/guidelines and will continue to do so. Please unblock. Chrisbinx (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm afraid I can't do anything about this block as it requires a checkuser to evaluate private data I cannot see, and administrators who ignore that and unblock anyway get desysopped and stripped of their tools, so nobody will do it. You need to email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org and appeal there. Sorry. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.