User talk:Chris Nb fc

August 2023

Hello, I'm Lightoil. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Ryujin (rapper), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Lightoil (talk) 14:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Part Six (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 190.203.163.220 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Part Six and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

190.203.163.220 (talk) 10:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris Nb fc! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 190.203.163.220 (talk) 10:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Part Six

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Part Six requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm ThadeusOfNazereth. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vincent Tomas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please utilize the WP:DRAFT and WP:AFC features of Wikipedia before turning a redirect into an article, especially if the article is going to be entirely unsourced. A guide that was super helpful when I started writing is Help:Your first article ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 01:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Part Six (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting.

You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references.

Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Part Six and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive behaviour

Hi @Chris Nb fc: I see your going around remove redirect in what is considered highly dispruptive behaviour. I had to revert this article Jay Khan after WP:NPP article review. If you keep doing it, I'm going to take you to WP:ANI and get you blocked. All your doing is wasting my time and your time. scope_creep^Talk 09:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: that seems like textbook WP:THREATENing behaviour. I would advise against it, especially as this is a new editor. Warnings? Yes. The edits are disruptive, but please assume good faith and inform the user why this behaviour is disruptive rather then threatening to have them blocked. Thank-you. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:29, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding this - There is almost never a reason to leave a comment like this on the page of somebody obviously editing in good faith. The edits are not constructive, but that can feasibly be corrected through education. It almost certainly won't be corrected through threats. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 13:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scope_creep, I encourage you to respond and apologize to Chris Nb fc. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The editor was not editing in good faith and it was not a threat. It was statement of fact. I do not threaten folk. Since the editor has arrived here, they have been continuallly disruptivly reverting articles. They seemed to have found the revert function very quickly. While that is perfectly reasonable in the correct conditions, doing it after folk, multiple editors have left edit summaries telling them that it is plainly wrong. The editor still cracked on. There is simply no reason for it and its disruptive. scope_creep^Talk 14:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then leave them a polite warning. Don't threaten a new editor with take you to WP:ANI and get you blocked. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Big In America moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Big In America. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:32, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike D'Angelo (singer)

A tag has been placed on Mike D'Angelo (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 12:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Future Love (Varsity Fanclub song) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Future Love (Varsity Fanclub song). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Varsity Fanclub (album) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Varsity Fanclub (album). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Cambridge Guys per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cambridge Guys. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]