User talk:ChrisLloyd58

I am a Professor of statistics. Our e-group had a nationwide discussion about the misinformation on basic statistics on the net and this Wiki page was one of the less egregious examples. But still completely wrong and it misleads students. The previous may be well cited but the reference texts do not support the text. For god sake, leave this page alone unless you are qualified to change it.

ChrisLloyd58 (talk) 23:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Statistical significance page

I noticed you reverted my reversion of your edit and did not even provide a single source to support your idiosyncratic definition of statistical significance. Previously, you made a bold edit and I reverted it. According to basic practices of Wikipedia (See WP:BRD), you are expected to discuss your edit on the Statistical Significance talk page and gain a consensus for your changes (see WP:consensus). At Wikipedia, we go by reliable sources (see WP:RS and WP:V), NOT according to your own personal opinion or credentials. A discussion section about the lead definition has already been opened on the page's talk page. I will respond to your comments there. Thank you. danielkueh (talk) 01:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]