User talk:Chris-martin/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Chris-martin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
TfD nomination of Template:Totally-disputed-section
Template:Totally-disputed-section has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Rogerb67 (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Could you please license Feather.svg also with Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5?
Could you please license Feather.svg also with Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5? There is currently a problem with a derivative work of the file, Stop bad orthography nuvola.svg. In that derivative work I merged your image and Stop hand nuvola.svg, which is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5. But your image, Feather.svg, is licensed only with GNU Free Documentation License, which is a ShareAlike-license. --Joku Janne (talk) 11:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- I hate this licensing nonsense. Seeing as this issue isn't actually the least bit important, and will never matter outside of Wikipedia (Since no one else actually looks at the license anyway), I just switched it to public domain. Enjoy. ~ Booya Bazooka 19:27, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Actually... crap, I can't even do that, because it's a derivative of File:Feather.jpg, which is GFDL. Can you further explain why this is necessary or possible? If it's a problem for you that my image doesn't have a CC license, that how can I add it, since the image I derived from doesn't have it either? ~ Booya Bazooka 19:39, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- D'oh! I did not notice the source of the SVG. Now I have to ask the author of the JPG image to license the JPG image with CC-BY-SA 2.5. And when he/she have changed the license, you can change the license for the SVG image, and when you have changed the license for the SVG image, Father.svg becomes legal. Now it is a copyright violation. --Joku Janne (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- And the author of the JPG image is inactive ([1]). He has made his last edit in August 2006. And he has not given his e-mail adress. The only choice is to license Stop2.png with GFDL and then license Stop hand nuvola.svg with GFDL. --Joku Janne (talk) 21:58, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Your userpage
Hi, you have very nice userpage, can i take some parts of it to use in my talkpage in Finnish wikipedia? --Olliii (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, use what you want. This is Wikipedia, so it's all open-licensed, right? :) ~ Booya Bazooka 20:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, it would be really helpful if you released File:P blank.svg under PD-self. I'm having trouble because I can't combine the template with LGPL images for example. This template is so widely derivatived, so it would really help. --Beao 13:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
image: rubik's cube.svg
Well, i did not understand whether this image is property of Rubik's Cube company or whether you made it from A to Z. Anyway, i wanted to notice you that a little french clothes company is making money with printing this image on tshirts. www.myspace.com/abclife shirt 79.86.55.136 (talk) 11:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC) Julien
VP Promotion
 |
Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC).
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Chat-related websites
Category:Chat-related websites, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Color icon white.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Color icon white.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. On commons, obsolete .png files, the others colors will be delete too V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 06:17, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
error in your Efron dice cube drawing
the top side of the last cube is empty, and it should be either 1 or 5, not blank — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.251.163.16 (talk) 03:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- The idea was to use the visible sides of each die to indicate probability. 1 and 5 have equal odds on that one, so I didn't want to show either number more often than the other. ~ Booya Bazooka 20:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
The article Branch water has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Nothing but a list of dictionary definitions; not disambiguating any Wikipedia article topics
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. R'n'B (call me Russ) 17:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
020413 DOJ White Paper
Hi, copy and paste is not the way to transwiki as it loses all the edit history. Consequently, I have deleted the page on enWS and removed the CSD template here. When it's transwiki-ed properly, we will require an appropriate licence and source along with a meaningful title rather then the jumble of digits and letters it currently has. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 04:21, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
The article Banerjee test has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Insanely technical article with no claim of notability, plain English explanation of the concept or clickable links to the same.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Aerovator.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Bot shutoff.svg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hip fracture treatment listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hip fracture treatment. Since you had some involvement with the Hip fracture treatment redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mschamberlain (talk) 16:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Active Time Battle listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Active Time Battle. Since you had some involvement with the Active Time Battle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
.22 calibre listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect .22 calibre. Since you had some involvement with the .22 calibre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Catholic-Hierarchy.org
The article Catholic-Hierarchy.org has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about the personal website of a COI spammer.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 17:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Chris-martin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Chris-martin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)